Challenge and response in the Colorado River Basin

Water Policy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Robison ◽  
Katja Bratrschovsky ◽  
Jaime Latcham ◽  
Eliza Morris ◽  
Vanessa Palmer ◽  
...  

The Colorado River Basin supplies water to roughly 40 million people in the south-western United States. A complex interstate regime that has evolved across the past century governs allocation and management of these coveted flows, and formidable challenges face this regime in contemporary times – a historical era aptly dubbed the ‘era of limits’. This paper illuminates these challenges and offers modest input regarding potential responses to them. We initially survey the evolution of the interstate water regime and outline its essential features as well as those of the basin. We then turn to the contemporary challenges and potential responses, which generally concern an unprecedented imbalance between water supplies and demands, long-standing disagreements over the meaning of the Colorado River Compact, water rights held by American Indian tribes on reservations throughout the basin, and ongoing biodiversity protection and salinity control efforts. We conclude by reflecting on lessons from and for the Colorado River Basin vis-à-vis the interstate water regimes existent in the other four basins encompassed within the Harvard Water Federalism Project.

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Evan R. Ward

“The Politics of Place”: Domestic and Diplomatic Priorities of the Colorado River SalinityControl Act (1974)This article analyzes the Colorado River Salinity Control Act (1974) from international,regional (Colorado River Basin), and local (Yuma County) perspectives. While the Nixonadministration simply wanted appropriations to build a desalination plant near Yuma,Arizona, in order to respond to Mexican complaints of saline river water south of theborder, regional (U.S.) leaders used the legislation to obtain additional salinity controlmeasures that would ostensibly conserve the Colorado River Basin’s shrinking watersupply. The article also examines the efforts of farmers, municipal leaders, and Quechan natives in Yuma County to shape the legislation to their advantage.Keywords: Environmental politics, Colorado River Delta, Yuma County, U.S.-MexicanRelations, Quechan Indians, desalination


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1659
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Norton ◽  
Matthew P. Dannenberg ◽  
Dong Yan ◽  
Cynthia S. A. Wallace ◽  
Jesus R. Rodriguez ◽  
...  

The Colorado River Basin (CRB) includes seven states and provides municipal and industrial water to millions of people across all major southwestern cities both inside and outside the basin. Agriculture is the largest part of the CRB economy and crop production depends on irrigation, which accounts for about 74% of the total water demand cross the region. A better understanding of irrigation water demands is critically needed as temperatures continue to rise and drought intensifies, potentially leading to water shortages across the region. Yet, past research on irrigation dynamics has generally utilized relatively low spatiotemporal resolution datasets and has often overlooked the relationship between climate and management decisions such as land fallowing, i.e., the practice of leaving cultivated land idle for a growing season. Here, we produced annual estimates of fallow and active cropland extent at high spatial resolution (30 m) from 2001 to 2017 by applying the fallow-land algorithm based on neighborhood and temporal anomalies (FANTA). We specifically focused on diverse CRB agricultural regions: the lower Colorado River planning (LCRP) area and the Pinal and Phoenix active management areas (PPAMA). Utilizing ground observations collected in 2014 and 2017, we found an overall classification accuracy of 88.9% and 87.2% for LCRP and PPAMA, respectively. We then quantified how factors such as climate, district water rights, and market value influenced: (1) annual fallow and active cropland extent and (2) annual cropland productivity, approximated by integrated growing season NDVI (iNDVI). We found that for the LCRP, a region of winter cropping and senior (i.e., preferential) water rights, active cropland productivity was positively correlated with cool-season average vapor pressure deficit (R = 0.72; p < 0.01). By contrast, for the PPAMA, a region of summer cropping and junior water rights, annual fallow and active cropland extent was positively correlated with cool-season aridity (precipitation/potential evapotranspiration) (R = 0.46; p < 0.05), and active cropland productivity was positively correlated with warm-season aridity (precipitation/potential evapotranspiration) (R = 0.42; p < 0.01). We also found that PPAMA cropland productivity was more sensitive to aridity when crop prices were low, potentially due to the influence of market value on management decisions. Our analysis highlights how biophysical (e.g., temperature and precipitation) and socioeconomic (e.g., water rights and crop market value) factors interact to explain seasonal patterns of cropland extent, water use and productivity. These findings indicate that increasing aridity across the region may result in reduced cropland productivity and increased land fallowing for some regions, particularly those with junior water rights.


1983 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 0738-0742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert G. Evans ◽  
Wynn R. Walker ◽  
Gaylord V. Skogerboe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document