Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) as bioindicators of stable water quality in Sydney Harbour during remediation of the Sydney Tar Ponds, Nova Scotia, Canada

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony R. Walker ◽  
Devin Macaskill ◽  
Peter Weaver

Contaminants were measured in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) in Sydney Harbour (SH) during remediation of the Sydney Tar Ponds (STPs) to assess the spatio-temporal distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and metals during baseline and remediation. Overall distribution of chemicals in mussels was compared to contaminants in other marine indicators. Metal concentrations in mussels showed some minor temporal variability, but did not appear to be directly related to remediation activities. Contaminants showed stable or decreasing concentrations, except Pb and Zn. Individual PAH compounds were mostly undetected, except for fluoranthene and pyrene. Concentrations of fluoranthene in mussels and water were weakly related (R2 = 0.72). PCBs were undetected, except during year 2 remediation at some near-field stations. Contaminants measured during this study were much lower than previously reported in other studies of mussels in SH, likely due to ongoing natural recovery and because of environmental mitigation measures implemented during remediation activities at the STPs. The lack of detection of most individual PAHs, PCBs, and low bioaccumulation of metals during baseline and remediation using mussels as bioindicators reveal subtle improvements in environmental quality in SH.

Oryx ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Herbert H.T. Prins ◽  
Yorick Liefting ◽  
Joost F. de Jong

Abstract In areas where farmland borders protected areas, wildlife may be attracted to crops and cause substantial financial damage for farmers. Elephants, in particular, can destroy a year's harvest in a single night, and can also cause damage to buildings and other farm structures. Few studies have examined whether damage caused by wild elephants increases social inequalities in farmer communities. We interviewed settlement leaders and subsistence rice farmers living in the buffer zone of Bardiya National Park, Nepal, to examine (1) the variation and spatial distribution of wealth within the farmer community, (2) the severity and spatio-temporal distribution of damage inflicted by Asian elephants Elephas maximus, and (3) the willingness to insure against such damage. We investigated whether particular societal strata are disproportionally affected by negative interactions with elephants. We found that farmers near the boundary between agricultural and wilderness areas were significantly poorer and had smaller landholdings than those further into the cultivated lands. Concomitantly, damage to crops and houses was more frequent nearer the wilderness–agriculture boundary than further away from it. Hence, in the buffer zone of Bardiya National Park, farmers near the wilderness–cultivation boundary, with small landholdings, had a relatively higher cost of elephant damage, yet were less willing to pay for an insurance scheme. We infer that in areas where both social inequality and damage caused by wildlife are spatially structured, conservation success may cause economic hardship for the local community, particularly for the poorer class. We discuss causes of the current lack of communal mitigation measures against the damage caused by elephants in the Park, and potential solutions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raissa Andong Omores ◽  
Francois Wewers ◽  
Priscilla O. Ikhide ◽  
Thomas Farrar ◽  
Abdu-rahim Giwa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document