Application of ultrasound and air stripping for the removal of aromatic hydrocarbons from spent sulfidic caustic for use in autotrophic denitrification as an electron donor

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (7) ◽  
pp. 1497-1502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Ho Lee ◽  
Jeung-Jin Park ◽  
Gi-Choong Choi ◽  
Im-Gyu Byun ◽  
Tae-Joo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Electron Donor ◽  
Aromatic Hydrocarbons ◽  
Ultrasound Irradiation ◽  
Phenol Removal ◽  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
Air Stripping ◽  
Spent Sulfidic Caustic ◽  
Study Laboratory ◽  
Sulfidic Caustic

Spent sulfidic caustic (SSC) produced from petroleum industry can be reused to denitrify nitrate-nitrogen via a biological nitrogen removal process as an electron donor for sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification, because it has a large amount of dissolved sulfur. However, SSC has to be refined because it also contains some aromatic hydrocarbons, typically benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX) and phenol that are recalcitrant organic compounds. In this study, laboratory-scale ultrasound irradiation and air stripping treatment were applied in order to remove these aromatic hydrocarbons. In the ultrasound system, both BTEX and phenol were exponentially removed by ultrasound irradiation during 60 min of reaction time to give the greatest removal efficiency of about 80%. Whereas, about 95% removal efficiency of BTEX was achieved, but not any significant phenol removal, within 30 min in the air stripping system, indicating that air stripping was a more efficient method than ultrasound irradiation. However, since air stripping did not remove any significant phenol, an additional process for degrading phenol was required. Accordingly, we applied a combined ultrasound and air stripping process. In these experiments, the removal efficiencies of BTEX and phenol were improved compared to the application of ultrasound and air stripping alone. Thus, the combined ultrasound and air stripping treatment is appropriate for refining SSC.

Characteristics of nitrogen removal and microbial distribution by application of spent sulfidic caustic in pilot scale wastewater treatment plant

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 1440-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Park ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
J. Park ◽  
I. Byun ◽  
T. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Donor ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Distribution Ratio ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Nitrifying Bacteria ◽  
Relative Distribution ◽  
Thiobacillus Denitrificans ◽  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
Spent Sulfidic Caustic ◽  
Sulfidic Caustic

Since spent sulfidic caustic (SSC) produced from petrochemical industry contains a high concentration of alkalinity and sulfide, it was expected that SSC could be used as an electron donor for autotrophic denitrification. To investigate the nitrogen removal performance, a pilot scale Bardenpho process was operated. The total nitrogen removal efficiency increased as SSC dosage increased, and the highest efficiency was observed as 77.5% when SSC was injected into both anoxic tank (1) and (2). FISH analysis was also performed to shed light on the effect of SSC dosage on the distribution ratio of nitrifying bacteria and Thiobacillus denitrificans. FISH results indicated that the relative distribution ratio of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, Nitrobacter spp., Nitrospira genus and Thiobacillus denitrificans to eubacteria varied little with the pH of the tanks, and SSC injection did not give harmful effect on nitrification efficiency. These results show that SSC can be applied as an electron donor of autotrophic denitrification to biological nitrogen removal process effectively, without any inhibitory effects to nitrifying bacteria and sulfur-utilizing denitrifying bacteria.

Field-scale application of spent sulfidic caustic as a source of alternative electron donor for autotrophic denitrification

2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 479-485
Author(s):  
Jae-Ho Lee ◽  
Jeung-Jin Park ◽  
Gi-Choong Choi ◽  
Im-Gyu Byun ◽  
Tae-Joo Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Donor ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Sulfide Concentration ◽  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
Field Scale ◽  
Oil Refineries ◽  
Spent Sulfidic Caustic ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sulfidic Caustic

Biological reuse of spent sulfidic caustic (SSC) originating from oil refineries is a promising method for the petrochemical industry because of low handling cost. SSC typically contains high concentrations of sulfur, with the most dominant sulfur compounds being sulfide (S2−). SSC is also characterized by a high pH and elevated alkalinity up to 5–15% by weight. Because of these characteristics, SSC can be used for denitrification of NO3−-N in the biological nitrogen removal process as both the electron donor and buffering agent in sulfur-utilizing autotrophic denitrification. In this study, two kinds of SSC (SSC I, SSC II) produced from two petrochemical companies were used for autotrophic denitrification in a field-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The effluent total nitrogen (TN) concentration in this process was about 10.5 mg/L without any external carbon sources and the nitrification efficiency was low, about 93.0%, because of alkalinity deficiency in the influent. The injection of SSC I, but not SSC II, promoted nitrification efficiency, which was attributed to the difference in the NaOH/S ratio between SSC I and II. SSC was injected based on sulfide concentration of SSC required to denitrify NO3−-N in the WWTP. SSC I had higher NaOH/S than SSC II and thus could supply more alkalinity for nitrification than SSC II. On the other hand, additional TN removal of about 9.0% was achieved with the injection of both SSCs. However, denitrification efficiency was not proportionally increased with increasing SSC injection because of NO3−-N deficiency in the anoxic tank due to the limited capacity of the recycling pump. For the same reason, sulfate concentration, which is the end product of sulfur-utilizing autotrophic denitrificaiton in the effluent, was also not increased with increasing SSC injection.

Simultaneous biological removal of sulphide and nitrate by autotrophic denitrification in an activated sludge system

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Manconi ◽  
A. Carucci ◽  
P. Lens ◽  
S. Rossetti
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Electron Donor ◽  
Product Formation ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
Biological Removal ◽  
N Removal ◽  
Activated Sludge Reactor ◽  
Denitrification Process

The feasibility of an autotrophic denitrification process in an activated sludge reactor, using sulphide as the electron donor, was tested for simultaneous denitrification and sulphide removal. The reactor was operated at nitrate (N) to sulphide (S) ratios between 0.5 and 0.9 to evaluate their effect on theN-removal efficiency, the S-removal efficiency and the product formation during anoxic oxidation of sulphide. One hundred per cent removal of both nitrate and sulphide was achieved at a NLR of 7.96 mmol N·L−1·d−1 (111.44 mg NO3−-N·L−1·d−1) and at a N/S ratio of 0.89 with complete oxidation of sulphide to sulphate. The oxygen level in the reactor (10%) was found to influence the N-removal efficiency by inhibiting the denitrification process. Moreover, chemical (or biological) oxidation of sulphide with oxygen occurred, resulting in a loss of the electron donor. FISH analysis was carried out to study the microbial population in the system.

Microbial community analysis in the autotrophic denitrification process using spent sulfidic caustic by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified genes

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-483 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. -H. Lee ◽  
S. -M. Lee ◽  
G. -C. Choi ◽  
H. -S. Park ◽  
D. -H. Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Microbial Community ◽  
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Community Analysis ◽  
Microbial Community Analysis ◽  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
Spent Sulfidic Caustic ◽  
Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Sulfidic Caustic

Spent sulfidic caustic (SSC) produced from petrochemical plants contains a high concentration of hydrogen sulfide and alkalinity, and some almost non-biodegradable organic compounds such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX). SSC is mainly incinerated with auxiliary fuel, leading to secondary pollution problems. The reuse of this waste is becoming increasingly important from economic and environmental viewpoints. To denitrify wastewater with low COD/N ratio, additional carbon sources are required. Thus, autotrophic denitrification has attracted increasing attention. In this study, SSC was injected as an electron donor for sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification in the modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) process. The efficiencies of nitrification, COD, and total nitrogen (TN) removal were evaluated with varying SSC dosage. Adequate SSC injection exhibited stable autotrophic denitrification. No BTEX were detected in the monitored BTEX concentrations of the effluent. To analyse the microbial community of the MLE process, PCR-DGGE based on 16 S rDNA with EUB primers, TD primers and nirK gene with nirK primers was performed in order to elucidate the application of the MLE process to SSC.

The feasibility of using spent sulfidic caustic as alternative sulfur and alkalinity sources in autotrophic denitrification

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Im-Gyu Byun ◽  
Ju-Hyun Ko ◽  
Young-Rok Jung ◽  
Tae-Ho Lee ◽  
Chang-Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autotrophic Denitrification ◽  
Spent Sulfidic Caustic ◽  
Sulfidic Caustic

Uncertainty in air stripping tower design: implications of the air-to-water ratio

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
B.I. Dvorak ◽  
J.W. Schauble
Keyword(s):  
Mass Transfer ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Air Stripping ◽  
Henry's Constant ◽  
True Value ◽  
Risk Of Failure ◽  
Process Failure ◽  
Removal Efficiencies ◽  
Water Ratio

Environmental engineers are frequently faced with uncertainty in making design decisions because the true value of many process parameters is unknown. In this study, the design of countercurrent air stripping towers was modeled using fuzzy numbers, taking into account uncertainties in mass transfer and Henry's constant. It was found that, in addition to cost, the risk of failure is an important design consideration for stripping tower design. A significant over-design is both cost-effective and results in less risk of design failure. The air-to-water ratio that yielded the least risk of failure switched from low to high as the removal efficiency of the tower increased. An important result is that at lower removal efficiencies, tower design and operation is most sensitive to uncertainties in mass transfer and at higher removal efficiencies, tower design and operation is most sensitive to uncertainties in Henry's constant . The implication is that low air-to-water ratios are best when the regulatory target removal efficiency is low and/or when the uncertainty in the value of the contaminant's Henry's constant is larger than the uncertainty in the mass transfer coefficient value. Otherwise a high air-to-water ratio results in the least risk of process failure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document