scholarly journals Measurement of the Positively Charged B+ Meson Cross-Section in Proton- Anti-Proton Collisions at 1.8-TeV using the Fully Reconstructed Decay $B^+ \to \ J/\psi\ K^+$

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd A. Keaffaber
2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Skwira-Chalot ◽  
N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki ◽  
St. Kistryn ◽  
A. Kozela ◽  
E. Stephan

AbstractDifferential cross section for the $$^1H(d,pp)n$$ 1 H ( d , p p ) n reaction is sensitive to various dynamical ingredients and allows for thorough tests of theoretical potentials describing the interaction in the three nucleon systems. The analysis of the experimental data collected for the breakup reaction at the beam energy of 100 MeV has been performed and the first cross section results for selected configurations are presented in this paper. They are in good agreement with calculations based on the realistic potentials. Studies at this relatively low energy will also be important for examining awaited calculations within the Chiral Effective Field Theory.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Ogul ◽  
Kamuran Dilsiz

Prediction of Z→l+l- production cross section (where l±=e±,μ±) in proton-proton collisions at s=14 TeV is estimated up to next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in perturbative QCD including next-to-leading order (NLO) electroweak (EW) corrections. The total inclusive Z boson production cross section times leptonic branching ratio, within the invariant mass window 66<mll<116 GeV, is predicted using NNLO HERAPDF2.0 at NNLO QCD and NLO EW as σZTot=2111.69-26.92+26.31 (PDF) ±11 (αs) ±17 (scale) -30.98+57.41 (parameterization and model). Theoretical prediction of the fiducial cross section is further computed with the latest modern PDF models (CT14, MMHT2014, NNPDF3.0, HERAPDF2.0, and ABM12) at NNLO for QCD and NLO for EW. The central values of the predictions are based on DYNNLO 1.5 program and the uncertainties are extracted using FEWZ 3.1 program. In addition, the cross section is also calculated as functions of μR and μF scales. The choice of μR and μF for scale variation uncertainty is further discussed in detail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document