The phenomenon of irregular frequencies or spurious modes when solving the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz integral equation has been extensively studied over the last six or seven decades. A class of common methods to overcome this phenomenon uses the linear combination of the Kirchhoff–Helmholtz integral equation and its normal derivative. When solving the Neumann problem, this method is usually referred to as the Burton and Miller method. This method uses a coupling parameter which, theoretically, should be complex with nonvanishing imaginary part. In practice, it is usually chosen proportional or even equal to [Formula: see text]. A literature review of papers about the Burton and Miller method and its implementations revealed that, in some cases, it is better to use [Formula: see text] as coupling parameter. The better choice depends on the specific formulation, in particular, on the harmonic time dependence and on the fundamental solution or Green’s function, respectively. Surprisingly, an unexpectedly large number of studies is based on the wrong choice of the sign in the coupling parameter. Herein, it is described which sign of the coupling parameter should be used for different configurations. Furthermore, it will be shown that the wrong sign does not just make the solution process inefficient but can lead to completely wrong results in some cases.
Wrong Sign Contamination in NOvA
