scholarly journals Preparation of LWBR (Light Water Breeder Reactor) spent fuel for shipment to ICPP (Idaho Chemical Processing Plant) for long term storage (LWBR Development Program). [Shippingport Atomic Power Station]

1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hodges
Keyword(s):  
Development Program ◽  
Atomic Power Station ◽  
Processing Plant ◽  
Chemical Processing ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Power Station ◽  
Light Water ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Term Storage

scholarly journals Application of Power Reactors for Transmutation of Actinides

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Bergelson ◽  
A. S. Gerasimov ◽  
G. V. Tikhomirov
Keyword(s):  
Power Reactor ◽  
Storage Facility ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Light Water ◽  
Water Power ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Self Service ◽  
Reactor Operating ◽  
Term Storage

Heavy-water and light-water power reactors can be used for partial transmutation of radwaste. Such transmutation allows us to limit on relatively low level the radiotoxicity accumulated in long-term storage of spent fuel. At transmutation in PHWR-880 reactor operating in the mode of self-service, equilibrium radiotoxicity in storage facility and the time of its achievement are 4–5 times less than for the transmutation in power reactor VVER-1000.

Decommissioning of the A-1 NPP Long-Term Storage Facility

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Medved ◽  
Ladislav Vargovcik
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Water Jet ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Storage Facility ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Special Equipment ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Term Storage

The paper deals with experience, techniques and new applied equipment durig undergoing decommissioning process of the A-1 NPP long-term pool storage and the follow-up decommissioning plan. For rad-waste disposal of the long-term pool storage (where most of the contaminants had remained following the removal of spent fuel) special equipment has been developed, designed, constructed and installed. The purpose of this equipment is the restorage, drainage and fragmentation of cartridges (used as a spent fuel case), as well as treatment of sludge (located at the pool bottom) and of the remaining liquid radwaste. The drainage equipment for cartridges is designed for discharging KCr2 solution from cartridges with spent fuel rods into the handling storage tank in the short-term storage facility and adjustment of the cartridges for railway transport, prior to the liquidation of the spent fuel rod. The equipment ensures full remote visual control of the process and exact monitoring of its technical parameters, including that of the internal nitrogen atmosphere concentration value. Cartridges without fuel and liquid filling are transferred to the equipment for their processing which includes fragmentation into smaller parts, decontamination, filling into drums with their sealed closing and measurement of radioactive dose. For the fragmentation, special shearing equipment is used which leaves the pipe fragment open for the following decontamination. For cleaning the cartridge bottom from radioactive sludge water jet system is used combined with slow speed milling used for preparing the opening for water jet nozzle. The sludge from the cartridge bottom is fixed into ceramic matrix. Nuclear Power Plant JE A-1 (since 1980 in decommissioning) is situated in the locality of Jaslovske´ Bohunice. So far the decommissioning of the Long-term storage was carried out within Stage I of A-1NPP decommissioning. This year the Stage I of decommissioning finished, and the performance of Stage II of decommissioning was started. Decommissioning of the long-term storage facility continues within Stage II of the A-1 NPP decommissioning process.

Dry Storage of the BR3 Spent Fuel in the CASTOR® BR3 Cask

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luc Ooms ◽  
Vincent Massaut ◽  
L. Noynaert ◽  
M. Braeckeveldt ◽  
G. Geenen
Keyword(s):  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Dual Purpose ◽  
Shock Absorbers ◽  
Commercial Plant ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Fuel Assemblies ◽  
Test Reactor ◽  
And Storage ◽  
Term Storage

The BR3 reactor was the first PWR plant installed in Europe. Started in 1962, BR3 was definitely shut down on June 30th, 1987. Used at the beginning of its life as a training device for commercial plant operators, it was also used during its whole life as test-reactor for new fuel types and assemblies. Most of the spent fuel was stored in the deactivation pool of the plant for more than 15 years. The reactor being now in decommissioning, it was decided to remove the spent fuel from the plant. After comparison of different solutions, the long term storage in dual purpose storage casks was selected in 1997. The selected CASTOR-BR3® cask is designed as a transport and storage cask for accommodating 30 spent fuel assemblies. As a type B(U) cask fitted with shock absorbers, it meets the transport requirements according to the IAEA guidelines and fulfils also the conditions for cask storage.

Sorption of Actinides in Well-Defined Oxidation States on Geologic Media

1981 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Allard ◽  
U. Olofsson ◽  
B. Torstenfelt ◽  
H. Kipatsi ◽  
K. Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Oxidation States ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Term Storage ◽  
Geologic Media

The long-lived actinides and their daughter products largely dominate the biological hazards from spent nuclear fuel already from some 300 years after the discharge from the reactor and onwards . Therefore it is essential to make reliable assessments of the geochemistry of these elements in any concept for long-term storage of spent fuel or reprocessing waste, etc.

Managing Aging Effects on Used Fuel Dry Cask for Very Long-Term Storage

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omesh Chopra ◽  
Dwight Diercks ◽  
David Ma ◽  
Vikram Shah ◽  
Shiu-Wing Tam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
National Laboratory ◽  
Argonne National Laboratory ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Aging Effects ◽  
Aging Research ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Term Storage ◽  
The U.S

The cancellation of the Yucca Mountain repository program in the Unites States raises the prospect of very long-term storage (i.e., >120 years) and deferred transportation of used fuel at the nuclear power plant sites. While long-term storage of used nuclear fuel in dry cask storage systems (DCSSs) at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSIs) is already a standard practice among U.S. utilities, recent rule-making activities of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) indicated additional flexibility for the NRC licensees of ISFSIs and certificate holders of the DCSSs to request initial and renewal terms for up to 40 years. The proposed rule also adds a requirement that renewal applicants must provide descriptions of aging management programs (AMPs) and time-limited aging analyses (TLAAs) to ensure that the structures, systems, and components (SSCs) that are important to safety in the DCSSs will perform as designed under the extended license terms. This paper examines issues related to managing aging effects on DCSSs for very long-term storage (VLTS) of used fuels, capitalizing on the extensive knowledge and experience accumulated from the work on aging research and life cycle management at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) over the last 30 years. The technical basis for acceptable AMPs and TLAAs is described, as are generic AMPs and TLAAs that are being developed by Argonne under the support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Used Fuel Disposition Campaign for R&D on extended long-term storage and transportation.

scholarly journals Recycling versus Long-Term Storage of Nuclear Fuel: Economic Factors

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Yolanda Moratilla Soria ◽  
Maria Uris Mas ◽  
Mathilde Estadieu ◽  
Ainhoa Villar Lejarreta ◽  
David Echevarria-López
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Spent Nuclear Fuel ◽  
Economic Factors ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Closed Cycle ◽  
Spent Fuel ◽  
Long Term Storage ◽  
Open Cycle ◽  
Term Storage

The objective of the present study is to compare the associated costs of long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel—open cycle strategy—with the associated cost of reprocessing and recycling strategy of spent fuel—closed cycle strategy—based on the current international studies. The analysis presents cost trends for both strategies. Also, to point out the fact that the total cost of spent nuclear fuel management (open cycle) is impossible to establish at present, while the related costs of the closed cycle are stable and known, averting uncertainties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document