GuidAge Study: A 5-Year Double Blind, Randomised Trial of EGb 761 for the Prevention of Alzheimers Disease in Elderly Subjects with Memory Complaints. I. Rationale, Design and Baseline Data

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Andrieu ◽  
Pierre-Jean Ousset ◽  
Nicola Coley ◽  
Mehemed Ouzid ◽  
Helene Mathiex-Fortunet ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. S73-S73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Vellas ◽  
Sandrine Andrieu ◽  
Pierre-Jean Ousset ◽  
Mehemed Ouzid ◽  
Hélène Mathiex-Fortunet ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 511-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Kobayashi ◽  
T. Kuhara ◽  
M. Oki ◽  
J.-Z. Xiao

In our previous study, we reported the therapeutic potential of Bifidobacterium breve A1 in preventing cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease and participants with mild cognitive impairment; we suggested that probiotic supplementation is an effective therapeutic strategy for managing cognitive function. Accordingly, we conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess whether 12-week B. breve A1 supplementation could affect the cognitive function of elderly subjects with memory complaints. We assessed cognitive function using the Japanese version of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and after 12 weeks of probiotic supplementation. A total of 121 participants were randomised and received B. breve A1 capsules or placebo daily for 12 weeks; of these, 117 participants completed the study. At 12 weeks, neuropsychological test scores significantly increased in both groups; no significant intergroup difference was observed in terms of changes in scores from the baseline scores. However, a stratified analysis revealed a significant difference between B. breve A1 and placebo groups in terms of the subscale ‘immediate memory’ of RBANS and MMSE total score in the subjects with low RBANS total score at baseline. No significant differences in terms of blood parameters between the groups or adverse effects caused by B. breve A1 intervention were observed. The results of the present study suggest the safety of B. breve A1 supplementation and its potential in maintaining cognitive function in elderly subjects with memory complaints. However, future large-scale studies on individuals with impaired cognitive function are required to validate the present findings.


2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Brugnolo ◽  
Silvia Morbelli ◽  
Dario Arnaldi ◽  
Fabrizio De Carli ◽  
Jennifer Accardo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1679-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Coutinho ◽  
Cláudia Drummond ◽  
Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza ◽  
Jorge Moll ◽  
Fernanda Tovar-Moll ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackground:Prose memory tests exhibit ecological validity, but the influence of non-memory functions on immediate recall in elderly subjects with memory complaints has not been fully investigated. This study examined (1) whether the ability to immediately recall a story can distinguish among clinical controls, amnesic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and (2) which cognitive functions contribute to immediate recall performance.Methods:A total of 73 consecutive volunteers (50 women and 23 men) aged 47–88 (mean age = 71.85 ± 9.41) and with a mean schooling level of 12.51 (SD = 4.09) participated in the experiment. All individuals were seeking specialized evaluation because of memory complaints. Diagnoses were made by considering clinical, neuropsychological, and MRI assessments collected by a multidisciplinary team of neurologists, neuropsychologists, and speech-language therapists. A total of 26 individuals were classified as clinical controls; 27 as MCI patients; and 20 as having AD dementia. All individuals in the AD group had a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ≤ 1.Results:Immediate recall was only able to distinguish AD subjects from MCI patients and clinical controls (p > 0.05). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis revealed that mental status (MMSE), semantic memory (WAIS-III vocabulary) and episodic memory (RAVLT primacy) explained approximately 62% of the variance in immediate recall.Conclusions:Understanding the value and limitations of immediate story recall in distinguishing between MCI and AD may help clinicians in better choosing cognitive tests to diagnose MCI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document