Is Combination Therapy of Atosiban and Nifedipine More Effective in Preterm Labor than Each Drug Alone? A Prospective Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Madkour ◽  
Amr Abdelhamid
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-82-S-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dino Tarabar ◽  
Katia El Jurdi ◽  
Olivia Yvellez ◽  
Zoran Milenkovic ◽  
Stanko Petrovic ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 852-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Dessinioti ◽  
C. Zisimou ◽  
V. Tzanetakou ◽  
A. Stratigos ◽  
C. Antoniou

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Li ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
...  

Background: Lactulose can be used to manage chronic constipation and children who are withholding their bowel movements, but no studies are available regarding lactulose to treat pediatric extraordinary daytime urinary frequency (PEDUF). To explore the benefits of different therapeutic regimens (non-drug treatment vs. oral lactulose) in patients with PEDUF.Methods: This prospective study included PEDUF patients admitted to the Pediatric Center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao) from January 2015 to December 2019. The patients randomized received non-drug treatment (counseling), drug treatment (lactulose), or combination therapy. A therapeutic effect was defined by a decrease of>10% of the urination frequency.Results: A total of 210 patients were included. They were 5.9 ± 0.4 years. There were 98 boys and 112 girls. Among the 210 patients, 82.4% (173/210) of their family members reported symptoms of constipation. Among the three groups, the response rate was 61.4% (43/70) in the non-drug treatment group, 90.0% (63/70) in the drug treatment group, and 91.4% (64/70) in the combination therapy group (P < 0.0001).Conclusion: The frequency of constipation in children with PEDUF is high. The use of a laxative, like lactulose, might achieve a high therapeutic response rate in children with PEDUF, higher than counseling alone. That might represent a valuable therapeutic strategy for PEDUF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 923-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitipong Permpalung ◽  
Navaporn Worasilchai ◽  
Kasama Manothummetha ◽  
Pattama Torvorapanit ◽  
Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul ◽  
...  

Abstract Ocular pythiosis is the second most common form of human pythiosis, and the rates of evisceration/enucleation in Thailand are 55–79%. This prospective study was conducted to evaluate treatment outcomes of the combination therapy protocol and the potential use of serum (1→3)-β-glucan (BG) and Pythium insidiosum-specific antibody (Pi-Ab) as an aid to diagnosis and monitoring of ocular pythiosis. Thirty patients were enrolled in the study and 14 (non-globe salvage) required evisceration/enucleation. The globe salvage group was significantly younger, and first ocular surgeries were performed significantly sooner than in the non-globe salvage group. Serum BG and Pi-Ab levels were similar among the 2 groups over time. In vitro susceptibility testing of antifungal agents revealed relatively high minimum inhibitory concentrations and lack of synergistic effect. Serum BG and Pi-Ab would not be useful in diagnosis and monitoring of ocular pythiosis. Until effective antimicrobial agents are discovered, ocular surgeries are still the mainstay therapy in Thailand.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document