Getting It Right: The Hampton Roads Approach to Hydraulic Model Data Collection and Management

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
pp. 427-443
Author(s):  
Priyanka Mohandoss ◽  
Ing. Matthias Wittenberg ◽  
Robert J Martz
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Michael C Morgan ◽  
Phillip L Hubbard ◽  
Robert J Martz ◽  
Charles I Moore ◽  
Matthias Wittenberg

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Erickson ◽  
Patricio Fajnwaks ◽  
Steve G. Langer ◽  
John Perry

Author(s):  
Aditi Misra ◽  
Aaron Gooze ◽  
Kari Watkins ◽  
Mariam Asad ◽  
Christopher A. Le Dantec

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 341-344
Author(s):  
Stephanie Dribben ◽  
Mary P. Curtis ◽  
Randi Foraker ◽  
Catherine Kush ◽  
Anne Trolard

Author(s):  
Cees Th Smit Sibinga

Qualitative data collection is largely defined by the personal experience and opinions of the examinee. The examinee is central in the approach, and not so much the researcher. The essence is a communication between the researcher and the examinee, where interpretation of both the questions asked and the answers provided serves the purpose of understanding. This type of research is interpretative and almost exclusively subjective, because the personal or subjective way of understanding and interpretation is central. However, there is certainly a serious possibility for external influence on the answers to be provided or even the way answers are interpreted. Additionally, there is a fair chance that the questions are phrased towards expected answers. There are various moments where ethics are paramount to the quality and acceptability of the research. To protect objectivity, ethical professionalism and professional morale are important. This chapter aims to describe and discuss ethical issues related to collection and management of data from qualitative research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document