Counseling of Individuals with Behavioral Addiction (oniomania).

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 100-106
Author(s):  
E.G. Kovalchuk ◽  
◽  
E.G. Isaeva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Addiction

Binge Eating and Problem Gambling are Associated with Common and Distinct Deficits in Emotion Regulation among Community Women: Results from a Prospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Farstad ◽  
Kristin M. von Ranson
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Emotion Regulation ◽  
Binge Eating ◽  
Problem Gambling ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Emotion Dysregulation ◽  
Behavioral Addiction ◽  
Negative Urgency ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Severe Problem

To elucidate similarities and differences between binge eating and a behavioral addiction, this prospective study compared facets of emotion regulation that were associated with problem gambling, the only formally recognized behavioral addiction, and binge eating. Community-based women (N = 202) who engaged in at-risk binge eating (n = 79), at-risk gambling (n = 36), or both (n = 87) completed four online assessments over six months. Baseline and six-month surveys assessed self-reported emotion dysregulation (using the DERS and UPPS-P), binge eating (using the EDE-Q), and gambling (using the PGSI); abbreviated two- and four-month surveys assessed only binge eating and gambling. Binge eating and problem gambling were both associated with emotion dysregulation, and greater positive urgency was correlated with more severe problem gambling but less frequent binge eating. Negative urgency explained no unique variance in binge eating or problem gambling changes over time, once other facets of emotion dysregulation (i.e., positive urgency and facets assessed by the DERS) were included. Thus, previous cross-sectional research may have overestimated the association of negative urgency with both binge eating and problem gambling. Overall, these findings suggest that binge eating and problem gambling are associated with common as well as distinct emotion regulation deficits.

Behavioral Addiction

2016 ◽  
pp. 135-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Shaffer ◽  
P.M. Shaffer
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Addiction

scholarly journals A Comparison of Treatment-Seeking Behavioral Addiction Patients with and without Parkinson’s Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Sauvaget ◽  
Susana Jiménez-Murcia ◽  
Fernando Fernández-Aranda ◽  
Roser Granero ◽  
Marie Grall-Bronnec ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Behavioral Addiction ◽  
Treatment Seeking

scholarly journals A new behavioral addiction: NEWS addiction

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Anil Kakunje ◽  
Neha Shetty ◽  
KiranP K Kumar ◽  
Sowmya Puthran
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Addiction

scholarly journals Pathological gambling: a behavioral addiction

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Mann ◽  
Mira Fauth-Bühler ◽  
Susumu Higuchi ◽  
Marc N. Potenza ◽  
John B. Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Pathological Gambling ◽  
Behavioral Addiction

scholarly journals Monoamine and genome-wide DNA methylation investigation in behavioral addiction

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yui Asaoka ◽  
Moojun Won ◽  
Tomonari Morita ◽  
Emi Ishikawa ◽  
Young-A Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Behavioral Addiction ◽  
Genome Wide

Non-addictive psychoactive drug use: Implications for behavioral addiction

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 315-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark D. Griffiths
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Psychoactive Drug ◽  
Behavioral Addiction ◽  
Specific Reference ◽  
Addictive Behaviors ◽  
Psychoactive Substances ◽  
Addictive Drug

AbstractThe newly proposed framework for non-addictive psychoactive substances postulated by Müller & Schumann (M&S) provides an interesting and plausible explanation for non-addictive drug use. However, with specific reference to the relevant behavioral addiction literature, this commentary argues that the model may unexpectedly hold utility not only for non-addictive use of drugs, but also for non-addictive use of other potentially addictive behaviors.

scholarly journals Does Smartphone Addiction Fall on a Continuum of Addictive Behaviors?

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Yu ◽  
Steve Sussman
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Addiction ◽  
Smartphone Addiction ◽  
Gaming Addiction ◽  
Addictive Behaviors ◽  
Problematic Smartphone Use ◽  
Causal Pathways ◽  
Current Review ◽  
The Social ◽  
Smartphone Use ◽  
Meta Analyses

Due to the high accessibility and mobility of smartphones, widespread and pervasive smartphone use has become the social norm, exposing users to various health and other risk factors. There is, however, a debate on whether addiction to smartphone use is a valid behavioral addiction that is distinct from similar conditions, such as Internet and gaming addiction. The goal of this review is to gather and integrate up-to-date research on measures of smartphone addiction (SA) and problematic smartphone use (PSU) to better understand (a) if they are distinct from other addictions that merely use the smartphone as a medium, and (b) how the disorder(s) may fall on a continuum of addictive behaviors that at some point could be considered an addiction. A systematic literature search adapted from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method was conducted to find all relevant articles on SA and PSU published between 2017 and 2019. A total of 108 articles were included in the current review. Most studies neither distinguished SA from other technological addictions nor clarified whether SA was an addiction to the actual smartphone device or to the features that the device offers. Most studies also did not directly base their research on a theory to explain the etiologic origins or causal pathways of SA and its associations. Suggestions are made regarding how to address SA as an emerging behavioral addiction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document