Relation algebra reducts of cylindric algebras and complete representations

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 673-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch
Keyword(s):  
Elementary Theory ◽  
Winning Strategy ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Complete Representation ◽  
Recursively Enumerable ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Image Position

AbstractWe show, for any ordinal γ ≥ 3, that the class ℜaCAγ is pseudo-elementary and has a recursively enumerable elementary theory. ScK denotes the class of strong subalgebras of members of the class K. We devise games, Fn (3 ≤ n ≤ ω), G, H, and show, for an atomic relation algebra with countably many atoms, thatfor 3 ≤ n < ω. We use these games to show, for γ > 5 and any class K of relation algebras satisfyingthat K is not closed under subalgebras and is not elementary. For infinite γ, the inclusion ℜaCAγ ⊂ ScℜaCAγ is strict.For infinite γ and for a countable relation algebra we show that has a complete representation if and only if is atomic and ∃ has a winning strategy in F (At()) if and only if is atomic and ∈ ScℜaCAγ.

scholarly journals THE VARIETY OF COSET RELATION ALGEBRAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (04) ◽  
pp. 1595-1609 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEVEN GIVANT ◽  
HAJNAL ANDRÉKA
Keyword(s):  
Large Class ◽  
Identity Element ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Order Theory ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
First Order Theory ◽  
Atomic Pair ◽  
Finite Set ◽  
Image Position

AbstractGivant [6] generalized the notion of an atomic pair-dense relation algebra from Maddux [13] by defining the notion of a measurable relation algebra, that is to say, a relation algebra in which the identity element is a sum of atoms that can be measured in the sense that the “size” of each such atom can be defined in an intuitive and reasonable way (within the framework of the first-order theory of relation algebras). In Andréka--Givant [2], a large class of examples of such algebras is constructed from systems of groups, coordinated systems of isomorphisms between quotients of the groups, and systems of cosets that are used to “shift” the operation of relative multiplication. In Givant--Andréka [8], it is shown that the class of these full coset relation algebras is adequate to the task of describing all measurable relation algebras in the sense that every atomic and complete measurable relation algebra is isomorphic to a full coset relation algebra.Call an algebra $\mathfrak{A}$ a coset relation algebra if $\mathfrak{A}$ is embeddable into some full coset relation algebra. In the present article, it is shown that the class of coset relation algebras is equationally axiomatizable (that is to say, it is a variety), but that no finite set of sentences suffices to axiomatize the class (that is to say, the class is not finitely axiomatizable).

Relation algebra reducts of cylindric algebras and an application to proof theory

2002 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson ◽  
Roger D. Maddux
Keyword(s):  
Proof Theory ◽  
Predicate Logic ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
Order Language ◽  
Binary Relation Symbol ◽  
Made In

AbstractWe confirm a conjecture, about neat embeddings of cylindric algebras, made in 1969 by J. D. Monk, and a later conjecture by Maddux about relation algebras obtained from cylindric algebras. These results in algebraic logic have the following consequence for predicate logic: for every finite cardinal α ≥ 3 there is a logically valid sentence X, in a first-order language ℒ with equality and exactly one nonlogical binary relation symbol E, such that X contains only 3 variables (each of which may occur arbitrarily many times), X has a proof containing exactly α + 1 variables, but X has no proof containing only α variables. This solves a problem posed by Tarski and Givant in 1987.

Omitting types for finite variable fragments and complete representations of algebras

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajnal Andréka ◽  
István Németi ◽  
Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Order Logic ◽  
First Order Logic ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
First Order ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Representations Of Algebras ◽  
Omitting Types ◽  
Binary Relation Symbol

AbstractWe give a novel application of algebraic logic to first order logic. A new, flexible construction is presented for representable but not completely representable atomic relation and cylindric algebras of dimension n (for finite n > 2) with the additional property that they are one-generated and the set of all n by n atomic matrices forms a cylindric basis. We use this construction to show that the classical Henkin-Orey omitting types theorem fails for the finite variable fragments of first order logic as long as the number of variables available is > 2 and we have a binary relation symbol in our language. We also prove a stronger result to the effect that there is no finite upper bound for the extra variables needed in the witness formulas. This result further emphasizes the ongoing interplay between algebraic logic and first order logic.

Step by step – Building representations in algebraic logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Finite Case ◽  
Representable Relation Algebra ◽  
Important Open Problem ◽  
Player Game ◽  
Representable Relation

AbstractWe consider the problem of finding and classifying representations in algebraic logic. This is approached by letting two players build a representation using a game. Homogeneous and universal representations are characterized according to the outcome of certain games. The Lyndon conditions defining representable relation algebras (for the finite case) and a similar schema for cylindric algebras are derived. Finte relation algebras with homogeneous representations are characterized by first order formulas. Equivalence games are defined, and are used to establish whether an algebra is ω-categorical. We have a simple proof that the perfect extension of a representable relation algebra is completely representable.An important open problem from algebraic logic is addressed by devising another two-player game, and using it to derive equational axiomatisations for the classes of all representable relation algebras and representable cylindric algebras.Other instances of this approach are looked at, and include the step by step method.

On complete atomic proper relation algebras

1950 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Harary
Keyword(s):  
Positive Integer ◽  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Perfect Squares

The object of this note is to classify the isomorphism types of all complete atomic proper relation algebras. In particular we find that the number of abstractly distinct complete atomic proper finite relation algebras of 2m elements is equal to the number of distinct partitions of the positive integer m into summands which are perfect squares.A relation algebra is called complete atomic if its Boolean algebra is complete atomic. A proper relation algebra is a relation algebra whose elements are relations. Lyndon has recently proved, by constructing an appropriate finite relation algebra, that not every complete atomic relation algebra is isomorphic to a proper relation algebra.Henceforth, let us consider a complete atomic proper relation algebra. The atoms {〈a, b〉}, {〈c, d〉} will be called connected if and only if {a, b} ⋂ {c, d} is not empty. Let the relation of connectedness over the set B of all atoms be denoted by ~. For brevity let B = {b1,b2, …}. The relation ~ is obviously reflexive and symmetric. But ~ is not transitive, since a, b, c, d distinct implies {〈a, 0〉} ~ {〈b, c〉}, {〈b, c〉} ~ {〈c, d〉}, and {〈a, b〉} ≁ {〈c, d〉}.

Groups and Algebras of Binary Relations

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Givant ◽  
Hajnal Andréka
Keyword(s):  
Positive Solution ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Binary Relations ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Abstract Theory ◽  
Atomic Relation ◽  
Measurability Condition ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Representable Relation ◽  
Special Classes

AbstractIn 1941, Tarski published an abstract, finitely axiomatized version of the theory of binary relations, called the theory of relation algebras. He asked whether every model of his abstract theory could be represented as a concrete algebra of binary relations. He and Jónsson obtained some initial, positive results for special classes of abstract relation algebras. But Lyndon showed, in 1950, that in general the answer to Tarski's question is negative. Monk proved later that the answer remains negative even if one adjoins finitely many new axioms to Tarski's system. In this paper we describe a far-reaching generalization of the positive results of Jónsson and Tarski, as well as of some later, related results of Maddux. We construct a class of concrete models of Tarski's axioms—called coset relation algebras—that are very close in spirit to algebras of binary relations, but are built using systems of groups and cosets instead of elements of a base set. The models include all algebras of binary relations, and many non-representable relation algebras as well. We prove that every atomic relation algebra satisfying a certain measurability condition—a condition generalizing the conditions imposed by Jónsson and Tarski—is essentially isomorphic to a coset relation algebra. The theorem raises the possibility of providing a positive solution to Tarski's problem by using coset relation algebras instead of the standard algebras of binary relations.

scholarly journals On complete representations and minimal completions in algebraic logic, both positive and negative results

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Sayed Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Polyadic Algebras ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Complete Representations

Fix a finite ordinal \(n\geq 3\) and let \(\alpha\) be an arbitrary ordinal. Let \(\mathsf{CA}_n\) denote the class of cylindric algebras of dimension \(n\) and \(\sf RA\) denote the class of relation algebras. Let \(\mathbf{PA}_{\alpha}(\mathsf{PEA}_{\alpha})\) stand for the class of polyadic (equality) algebras of dimension \(\alpha\). We reprove that the class \(\mathsf{CRCA}_n\) of completely representable \(\mathsf{CA}_n$s, and the class \(\sf CRRA\) of completely representable \(\mathsf{RA}\)s are not elementary, a result of Hirsch and Hodkinson. We extend this result to any variety \(\sf V\) between polyadic algebras of dimension \(n\) and diagonal free \(\mathsf{CA}_n\)s. We show that that the class of completely and strongly representable algebras in \(\sf V\) is not elementary either, reproving a result of Bulian and Hodkinson. For relation algebras, we can and will, go further. We show the class \(\sf CRRA\) is not closed under \(\equiv_{\infty,\omega}\). In contrast, we show that given \(\alpha\geq \omega\), and an atomic \(\mathfrak{A}\in \mathsf{PEA}_{\alpha}\), then for any \(n<\omega\), \(\mathfrak{Nr}_n\A\) is a completely representable \(\mathsf{PEA}_n\). We show that for any \(\alpha\geq \omega\), the class of completely representable algebras in certain reducts of \(\mathsf{PA}_{\alpha}\)s, that happen to be varieties, is elementary. We show that for \(\alpha\geq \omega\), the the class of polyadic-cylindric algebras dimension \(\alpha\), introduced by Ferenczi, the completely representable algebras (slightly altering representing algebras) coincide with the atomic ones. In the last algebras cylindrifications commute only one way, in a sense weaker than full fledged commutativity of cylindrifications enjoyed by classical cylindric and polyadic algebras. Finally, we address closure under Dedekind-MacNeille completions for cylindric-like algebras of dimension \(n\) and \(\mathsf{PA}_{\alpha}\)s for \(\alpha\) an infinite ordinal, proving negative results for the first and positive ones for the second.

Complete representations in algebraic logic

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 816-847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Hirsch ◽  
Ian Hodkinson
Keyword(s):  
Boolean Algebra ◽  
Algebraic Logic ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Cylindric Algebras ◽  
Fixed Dimension ◽  
Complete Representations ◽  
Representable Relation

AbstractA boolean algebra is shown to be completely representable if and only if it is atomic, whereas it is shown that neither the class of completely representable relation algebras nor the class of completely representable cylindric algebras of any fixed dimension (at least 3) are elementary.

Inequivalent representations of geometric relation algebras

2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Givant
Keyword(s):  
Automorphism Group ◽  
Collineation Group ◽  
Relation Algebra ◽  
Projective Line ◽  
Finite Geometries ◽  
Relation Algebras ◽  
Geometric Relation ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Projective Lines ◽  
Inequivalent Representations

AbstractIt is shown that the automorphism group of a relation algebra constructed from a projective geometry P is isomorphic to the collineation group of P. Also, the base automorphism group of a representation of over an affine geometry D is isomorphic to the quotient of the collineation group of D by the dilatation subgroup. Consequently, the total number of inequivalent representations of , for finite geometries P, is the sum of the numberswhere D ranges over a list of the non-isomorphic affine geometries having P as their geometry at infinity. This formula is used to compute the number of inequivalent representations of relation algebras constructed over projective lines of order at most 10. For instance, the relation algebra constructed over the projective line of order 9 has 56,700 mutually inequivalent representations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document