Chapter 5. Age-related Differences and Associated Factors in Foreign Language Writing. Implications for L2 Writing Theory and School Curricula

Author(s):  
M. Luz Celaya ◽  
Teresa Navés
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Min-hsiu Tsai

Current research on second language (L2) anxiety solely deals with the vague fears. Those research results do notreflect L2 learners’ real concerns or furthermore help them to reduce the “tension” rather than anxiety. The researcherconsiders the need to distinguish L2 writing tension from L2 writing anxiety. Furthermore, this study attempts toinfuse the pragmatic aspect by adding two categories of questions related to actual situations and classroom activitiesto the Foreign Language Writing Anxiety Questionnaire (Tsai, 2012). The results of the Bivarited correlation testsshow both the inter-category and intra-category reach the significant level at .05 or better. Thus, the New ForeignLanguage Writing Anxiety Questionnaire (NFLWAQ, Appendix 1) is formed. Notably, the L2 writing tension in thisstudy is significantly higher than the foreign language writing anxiety in the overall group as well as every individualgroup at the significant level of .05 or better. The results indicate that the participants worry about real situations andclassroom activities more than the vague fears from nowhere. The peer review activity is recognized as the leastpressure source that L2 writing teachers might want to practice it from time to time to reduce students’ tension. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-492
Author(s):  
ROLA LABABIDI

Writing is an essential skill for language production. However, many English as Foreign language learners (EFL) face many difficulties in writing. This study aims to shed light on the psychological aspect of writing; more specifically writing anxiety. Consequently, the main purpose of this exploratory mixed-method study is to explore and investigate the sources and manifestations of foreign language writing anxiety among Lebanese university students. The participants were Lebanese EFL university students (N=87). Data for this study was gathered from the use of the Second Language Writing anxiety scale(SLWAI), Sources of Writing Anxiety Inventory(SWAI), and semi-structured Focus group interviews (FG). Focus interviews with students were used to triangulate the derived data from the inventories. This study provides numerical data regarding the level of writing anxiety among students. The data from the FG interviews were transcribed and uploaded for thematic coding and further analysis. The results from this study shed light on the sources and manifestation of the writing anxiety among students. It also helps to disseminate several practical recommendations for the alleviation of writing anxiety among students. It is assumed that the findings will address the perceived psychological needs of Lebanese EFL learners and provide grounds for further research.


Author(s):  
Umida Kulmagambetovna Khodjaniyazova 

This article is devoted to the problem of the development of writing competence in the process of foreign language teaching. The article refects the main directions of the language policy in the Republic Uzbekistan with reference to the fundamental normative documents in this area, describes the conditions for the successful language policy in the feld of foreign language education. The characteristic features of foreign language writing competence is presented. The concept of the term «approach» is analyzed by foreign scholars and the author focuses on the advantage of two modern approaches in teaching foreign language writing competence as Product approach and Process approach. A review of two modern approaches is presented by involving the points and claims of well-known foreign scholars. The article deals with the assessment criteria, the learning process and effective techniques that are used on the basis of product approach. It presents a typical model for process approach created by the English specialist C. Tribble. Carried out comparative analysis of two given approaches, leads to the conclusion that both product approach and process approach, despite of their advantages, are not perfect enough in teaching writing since both approaches were criticized by methodologists. As a result of the study, it is concluded that it is preferable to use a mixed approach, along with traditional ones to develop writing competence of students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document