Modern approaches in teaching writing skill within the process of foreign language teaching

Author(s):  
Umida Kulmagambetovna Khodjaniyazova 

This article is devoted to the problem of the development of writing competence in the process of foreign language teaching. The article refects the main directions of the language policy in the Republic Uzbekistan with reference to the fundamental normative documents in this area, describes the conditions for the successful language policy in the feld of foreign language education. The characteristic features of foreign language writing competence is presented. The concept of the term «approach» is analyzed by foreign scholars and the author focuses on the advantage of two modern approaches in teaching foreign language writing competence as Product approach and Process approach. A review of two modern approaches is presented by involving the points and claims of well-known foreign scholars. The article deals with the assessment criteria, the learning process and effective techniques that are used on the basis of product approach. It presents a typical model for process approach created by the English specialist C. Tribble. Carried out comparative analysis of two given approaches, leads to the conclusion that both product approach and process approach, despite of their advantages, are not perfect enough in teaching writing since both approaches were criticized by methodologists. As a result of the study, it is concluded that it is preferable to use a mixed approach, along with traditional ones to develop writing competence of students.

Neofilolog ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 165-181
Author(s):  
Magdalena Sowa

This article attempts to evaluate the quality and effectiveness of foreign language teaching in Polish schools by giving learners’ views on the process of the teaching of languages. The opinions presented come from a questionnaire carried out among pupils who learn various languages. The results of the survey are intended to show the learning situation as seen by students themselves. Their description and assessment of school learning enable us, to judge whether being taught a language in school satisfies their needs and expectations, and also to assess whether and to what extent this learning is consistent with European language policy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-136
Author(s):  
José Carlos Paes de Almeida Filho

RESUMO:O espectro de fatores coadjuvantes da formação de agentes para um ensino profissional e desenvolvido de línguas inclui uma política linguística que, por sua vez, abriga o campo das Políticas de Ensino de Línguas (Estrangeiras e Segundas) que nos interessam particularmente neste trabalho. Quando examinamos o índice obtido para o desenvolvimento do Ensino de PLE no Brasil, por exemplo, o quesito Políticas (oficiais) merece uma das mais baixas pontuações entre os catorze tomados em conta no trabalho de Almeida Filho (2007). Por que isso acontece? A situação é a mesma ou próxima a essa com referência às outras línguas de oferta no currículo escolar? O que é uma política de Ensino de Línguas e de PLE no arco de uma projetada política linguística no país? Quais os contornos de uma política de que precisamos para uso oficial e das instituições? Neste trabalho serão propostas respostas fundamentadas para essas questões atinentes a um nó que lentifica o desenvolvimento do Ensino de Línguas no país.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Índice de desenvolvimento do ensino de uma língua estrangeira. Política linguística. Política de ensino de línguas. Políticas para o Ensino de PLE. Contornos de uma política de ensino de línguas.ABSTRACT: The range of supporting factors in the education of agents for a professional and developed teaching of languages includes language planning whose scope is wider and shelters important second and foreign language policies. For example, when the index for the development of Portuguese as a Foreign Language in Brazil is considered, the topic of official policies deserves one of the lowest scores among the fourteen criteria taken into consideration in the paper by Almeida Filho (2007). Why does this happen? Is the prospect similar for the languages most commonly taught at schools? What is a language teaching policy in the realm of a supposed language policy enforced in the country? Which are the contours of a policy needed for official purposes and by the institutions? In this article some answers are attempted for these questions associated to a cause that slows the development of Foreign Language Teaching in the nation.KEYWORDS: Foreign Language teaching development index. Language policy. Language teaching policy. Policies for the teaching of Portuguese as a foreign language. Requirements for a language teaching policy.


Author(s):  
Michele Saraiva Carilo

This article aims to discuss the relationship between language policy, language-in-education policy and the foreign language teaching-learning process. In so doing, a critical review of relevant literature is offered with the purpose to clarify how the areas of enquiry related to language and language-in-education policymaking and enactment are intertwined to the practicalities of foreign language curriculum development and syllabus design. Such connection is represented by the politically-, ideologically- and socioculturally-driven choices of policymakers and policy enactors, as well as their influence on everyday foreign language practice. Criticality and authorship are advocated throughout this article as strategies on which teachers and students should rely in order to challenge predetermined and/or decontextualised directives concerning the foreign language teaching-learning process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-67
Author(s):  
Christiane Fäcke

Abstract The following paper provides a historical overview of foreign language education and foreign language teaching in Germany, including teaching methods and curricular developments. A special focus emphasizes language policy and its influence on language teaching, analysing language choice, language order and the predominance of English.


1992 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 37-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hallel ◽  
Bernard Spolsky

There is a slowly growing number of countries like Australia (Lo Bianco 1987) which have a formally developed national language policy, or like the Netherlands (van Els 1992a) which have fully articulated foreign language teaching policies. Other countries, like New Zealand (Waite 1992) and Finland (Takala 1992), are now attempting to develop such policies. In most countries, however, it is commonly the case that the foreign language policy has grown haphazardly and can be found only implicitly in a complex set of uncoordinated policies and practices. This latter description is true of Israel.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document