scholarly journals Follow-up Study of Removable Partial Denture with Magnetic Attachment by Questionnaire to Dentist.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Mizutani ◽  
Kazuo Nakamura ◽  
Minoru Ai
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Mohamed Afify ◽  
M. Helmy ◽  
N. Abbas

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate biting force of patients with unilateral mandibular distal extension area treated with two different designs of the removable partial denture (RPD), conventional RPD, and new design of extracoronal castable precision attachment (OT Unilateral attachment). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 16 patients with unilateral mandibular distal extension area with the second premolar is the last abutment teeth. The patients were divided into two equal groups, Group I received conventional RPD, which provides cross arch stabilization and a double Aker clasp was fabricated. Group II received new design of extracoronal castable precision attachment (OT Unilateral attachment). Evaluation of biting force by loadstar sensor, patients of both groups were evaluated at the time of prosthesis insertion, 3, 6, and 1 year later. Statistical analysis performing one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to compare between all follow-up periods within each group, comparison between two groups regarding each follow-up period was performed by independent t-test. RESULTS: Both treatments yielded better after-treatment summary when compared with the baseline; however, better results were obtained and showed a statistically significant increase in Group II (OT unilateral design), especially after 3, 6 months, and 1 year later. CONCLUSION: From the results of this study, it was concluded that: It is preferable to use the new design of extracoronal castable precision attachment (OT unilateral) being simpler, more comfortable to the patients and give high masticatory efficiency in the form of biting force than conventional RPD.  


2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Mijiritsky ◽  
Adi Lorean ◽  
Ziv Mazor ◽  
Liran Levin

1995 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichi Masumi ◽  
Mayumi Ozamoto ◽  
Masahiro Arita ◽  
Katsuaki Takeya ◽  
Tohru Mihara ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung-Woo Roh ◽  
Young-Chan Jeon ◽  
Chang-Mo Jeong ◽  
Mi-Jung Yoon ◽  
So-Hyoun Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 229-234
Author(s):  
Seham Ali El-Sayed Sabra ◽  
Gehan Fekry ◽  
Emad Agamy

AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate two different designs in mandibular bilateral free end saddle cases with the use of osseointegrated implants. The designs evaluated were OT-strategy extracoronal attachment and bar attachment. Radiographic evaluation was carried out for implants and natural abutment in terms of bone density. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 10 patients with bilateral distal extension area with missing molars bilaterally; the patients were divided into two groups after implant insertion on the second molar area. Group I: Patients received extracoronal attachment distal to the last natural abutment teeth with the construction of metallic removable partial denture (RPD). Group II: Patients received bar attachment with the construction of metallic RPD. Both groups have the maxillary arch edentulous with the construction of complete maxillary dentures within our study. Radiographic evaluation for bone density was done for both groups at the time of prosthesis insertion, 3, 6, and 9 months later. A comparison between the two groups regarding each follow-up period was performed by an independent t-test. RESULTS: Although there were some differences between both designs in the 1st-time intervals, generally, there were no significant differences between the two designs all over the 3-time intervals. CONCLUSION: From the results of this study, it was concluded that: Although there were no significant differences between both designs, bar-attachment showed better results which should be confirmed with more future researches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document