Research in Health Economics: A Survey

1975 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burton A. Weisbrod

This paper surveys the types of issues with which health economists have been concerned. It is intended to introduce noneconomists to the kinds of questions that economists have regarded as important. Economists' work in the health economics area may be usefully divided into “positive” and “normative” studies. Positive studies are those designed to describe, or make predictions about, how the health care system, or parts of it, actually operate. Conversely, normative studies are intended to provide statements as to how the health care system should operate. The major areas surveyed include the concept and estimation of the “production function” for health, the distinction between private and social costs, determinants of prices of medical inputs, and benefit-cost analysis.

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 640-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Nautiyal ◽  
J. L. Rezende

The reasons why benefit–cost analysis has not been very popular with foresters are indicated. Consideration of relative price changes and inflation, social costs of alternative projects, and most significantly, the dynamics of project evaluation can make forestry projects assume their due importance in investment analysis without resorting to the dubious logic of using lower discount rates than those used for other projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document