scholarly journals Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. e233 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Jonathon Rendina ◽  
Brian Mustanski
2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli S. Rosenberg ◽  
Richard B. Rothenberg ◽  
David G. Kleinbaum ◽  
Rob B. Stephenson ◽  
Patrick S. Sullivan

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2104-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Tyng Chen ◽  
Kristina Bowles ◽  
Qian An ◽  
Elizabeth DiNenno ◽  
Teresa Finlayson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 86 (S1) ◽  
pp. 5-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Y. Iguchi ◽  
Allison J. Ober ◽  
Sandra H. Berry ◽  
Terry Fain ◽  
Douglas D. Heckathorn ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052199745
Author(s):  
Rob Stephenson ◽  
Tanaka M.D. Chavanduka ◽  
Matthew T. Rosso ◽  
Stephen P. Sullivan ◽  
Renée A. Pitter ◽  
...  

Stay at home orders–intended to reduce the spread of COVID-19 by limiting social contact–have forced people to remain in their homes. The additional stressors created by the need to stay home and socially isolate may act as triggers to intimate partner violence (IPV). In this article, we present data from a recent online cross-sectional survey with gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in the United States to illustrate changes in IPV risks that have occurred during the U.S. COVID-19 epidemic. The Love and Sex in the Time of COVID-19 survey was conducted online from April to May 2020. GBMSM were recruited through paid banner advertisements featured on social networking platforms, recruiting a sample size of 696 GBMSM. Analysis considers changes in victimization and perpetration of IPV during the 3 months prior to the survey (March-May 2020) that represents the first 3 months of lockdown during the COVID-19 epidemic. During the period March-May 2020, 12.6% of participants reported experiencing any IPV with higher rates of emotional IPV (10.3%) than sexual (2.2%) or physical (1.8%) IPV. Of those who reported IPV victimization during lockdown, for almost half this was their first time experience: 5.3% reported the IPV they experienced happened for the first time during the past 3 months (0.8% physical, 2.13% sexual, and 3.3% emotional). Reporting of perpetration of IPV during lockdown was lower: only 6% reported perpetrating any IPV, with perpetration rates of 1.5% for physical, 0.5% for sexual, and 5.3% for emotional IPV. Of those who reported perpetration of IPV during lockdown, very small percentages reported that this was the first time they had perpetrated IPV: 0.9% for any IPV (0.2% physical, 0.2% sexual, and 0.6% emotional). The results illustrate an increased need for IPV resources for GBMSM during these times of increased stress and uncertainty, and the need to find models of resource and service delivery that can work inside of social distancing guidelines while protecting the confidentiality and safety of those who are experiencing IPV.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document