Where is the Scholarship in Student Affairs?

NASPA Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Jablonski

Four years ago the American College Personnel Association (ACPA) published a special issue of the Journal of College Student Development (JCSD) entitled "Scholarship in Student Affairs Reconsidered" (2001). A year later, the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators (NASPA) also compiled an issue of the NASPA Journal on "The Scholarship of Student Affairs" (2002). In these two volumes, 16 articles written by 17 notable scholars and practitioners in the field were presented for our careful consideration. Each association held a session or two at their annual conferences those years, and perhaps 100 colleagues from around the country discussed the ideas presented in these volumes. The vast majority of us, however, skimmed an article or two and went on with the immediate pressing demands of our daily lives. Three years later, the NASPA Journal has no backlog of articles to print. Our online process has enabled us to go from submission to publication in 4 to 6 months. We also have reduced our publication rate from the upper 40 percentile to the mid-20s. We are now waiting for quality manuscripts to arrive. The JCSD also is actively seeking new manuscripts. What has been missing in these past few years is a national discussion of the ideas presented in the two important volumes on scholarship that our associations published.This essay will provide a case for the imperative facing us: What is scholarship in student affairs? How does it inform our practice? How does practice lead to new theory and research? The NASPA Journal editorial board will elaborate on these questions in the coming year, with the intention of bringing together in 2006 a group of scholars and practitioners for a summit on scholarship in student affairs. The board will advance a national conversation among all the related associations (e.g., ACPA, AAHE, CAS, ASHE, ACUHO) on this important topic. Over the next year, we will initiate discussions with the leaders of these and many other associations with the goal of coming together in 2006 at our national conference in Washington DC. We will also present a few essays such as this one over the next year to help provide the framework for this future conversation.On the theory of "If you build it, they will come," we will provide thoughtful consideration of questions regarding scholarship in our field with the hope of creating interest and action. The "action" may have several outcomes: (a) raised awareness and knowledge by our members and colleagues about student affairs scholarship; (b) production of new knowledge that enhances our field and higher education in general; (c) deepening connections with related fields of academic study such as anthropology, sociology, and psychology; and (d) practice based on theory and research. We look forward to engaging you in this effort.

NASPA Journal ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D. Roper

For the past 18 months the NASPA Journal Editorial Board has been engaged in an ongoing conversation about the future direction of the Journal. Among the issues we have discussed are: What should comprise the content of the Journal?, How do we decide when or if we will move the Journal to an electronic format?, What do our members want in the Journal?, and What type of scholarship should we be publishing? The last question — What type of scholarship should we be publishing? — led to an energetic conversation within the Editorial Board.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Guiffrida

The importance of connections with peers to student development and retention has been highlighted in Astin's (1984) Theory of Student Involvement and Tinto's (1993) Theory of Student Departure, which are two of the most widely referenced and validated models in student affairs literature. However, recent research has questioned the applicability of these models to African American students who attend predominantly White institutions (PWIs). Although prior research has indicated that the models should be modified to recognize the importance of students’ relationships with their families, research has failed to understand the impact of relationships with friends from home. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the conditions under which friends from home were perceived as assets or liabilities to 99 African American undergraduates who attended a PWI. The results provide a link for broadening the applicability of Astin’s and Tinto's models and offer student affairs practitioners deeper insight into African American students' experiences at PWIs.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Herdlein

The scholarship of student affairs has neglected to carefully review its contextual past and, in the process, failed to fully integrate historical research into practice. The story of Thyrsa Wealtheow Amos and the history of the Dean of Women’s Program at the University of Pittsburgh,1919–41, helps us to reflect on the true reality of our work in higher education. Although seemingly a time in the distant past, Thyrsa Amos embodied the spirit of student personnel administration that shines ever so bright to thisd ay. The purpose of this research is to provide some of thatcontext and remind us of the values that serve as foundations of the profession.


NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis McCluskey-Titus ◽  
Tony W. Cawthon

A research study was conducted using the small population of current graduate preparation faculty who were both NASPA members and former student affairs practitioners (n=38). The purpose of this study was to discover the benefits and challenges faced by practitioners when moving from an administrative position to a full-time faculty position in a student personnel preparation program. The following subjects were considered in this study: factors respondents considered when moving to a full-time faculty position, challenges respondents encountered in making the career change, differences between former administrative positions and current faculty positions, and type of preparation respondents reported were necessary for success in a faculty role. Some of the positive differences respondents described included: control over their quality of life, the ability to focus on teaching and research, and the ability to contribute to the profession. Certain challenges were recounted by respondents such as adjusting to the faculty culture and work expectations, development of a research agenda, having fewer resources as a full-time faculty member, and a difference in quality and nature of relationships.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document