VERIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF STRUCTURAL DAMAGE ESTIMATION METHOD FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES BASED ON DAMAGE DATA OF THE 2016 KUMAMOTO EARTHQUAKE

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. I_765-I_773
Author(s):  
Kazuho OOMICHI ◽  
Shojiro KATAOKA
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
Estimation Method ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Damage Estimation ◽  
2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Damage Data

scholarly journals Structural damage to houses and buildings induced by liquefaction in the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake, Japan

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendra Setiawan ◽  
Yuko Serikawa ◽  
Mitsuru Nakamura ◽  
Masakatsu Miyajima ◽  
Masaho Yoshida
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake

scholarly journals STRUCTURAL DAMAGE TO SCHOOL GYMNASIUMS DUE TO THE 2016 KUMAMOTO EARTHQUAKE

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (58) ◽  
pp. 1313-1318
Author(s):  
Takanori ISHIDA ◽  
Jun IYAMA ◽  
Shoichi KISHIKI ◽  
Yuko SHIMADA ◽  
Satoshi YAMADA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Damage ◽  
2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake

scholarly journals Seismic velocity structure at the southern termination of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake rupture, Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhira Aoyagi ◽  
Haruo Kimura ◽  
Kazuo Mizoguchi
Keyword(s):  
Fault Zone ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Seismic Velocity ◽  
Earthquake Rupture ◽  
2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Seismic Velocity Structure ◽  
Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Seismogenic Layer ◽  
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Tectonic Line

Abstract The earthquake rupture termination mechanism and size of the ruptured area are crucial parameters for earthquake magnitude estimations and seismic hazard assessments. The 2016 Mw 7.0 Kumamoto Earthquake, central Kyushu, Japan, ruptured a 34-km-long area along previously recognized active faults, eastern part of the Futagawa fault zone and northernmost part of the Hinagu fault zone. Many researchers have suggested that a magma chamber under Aso Volcano terminated the eastward rupture. However, the termination mechanism of the southward rupture has remained unclear. Here, we conduct a local seismic tomographic inversion using a dense temporary seismic network to detail the seismic velocity structure around the southern termination of the rupture. The compressional-wave velocity (Vp) results and compressional- to shear-wave velocity (Vp/Vs) structure indicate several E–W- and ENE–WSW-trending zonal anomalies in the upper to middle crust. These zonal anomalies may reflect regional geological structures that follow the same trends as the Oita–Kumamoto Tectonic Line and Usuki–Yatsushiro Tectonic Line. While the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake rupture mainly propagated through a low-Vp/Vs area (1.62–1.74) along the Hinagu fault zone, the southern termination of the earthquake at the focal depth of the mainshock is adjacent to a 3-km-diameter high-Vp/Vs body. There is a rapid 5-km step in the depth of the seismogenic layer across the E–W-trending velocity boundary between the low- and high-Vp/Vs areas that corresponds well with the Rokkoku Tectonic Line; this geological boundary is the likely cause of the dislocation of the seismogenic layer because it is intruded by serpentinite veins. A possible factor in the southern rupture termination of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake is the existence of a high-Vp/Vs body in the direction of southern rupture propagation. The provided details of this inhomogeneous barrier, which are inferred from the seismic velocity structures, may improve future seismic hazard assessments for a complex fault system composed of multiple segments.

scholarly journals Correction to: Stress and pore fluid pressure control of seismicity rate changes following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake, Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kodai Nakagomi ◽  
Toshiko Terakawa ◽  
Satoshi Matsumoto ◽  
Shinichiro Horikawa
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Pressure ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Pore Fluid ◽  
2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Pore Fluid Pressure ◽  
Seismicity Rate ◽  
Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake ◽  
Seismicity Rate Changes

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document