scholarly journals Trends in Disparities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation in the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1500-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. King ◽  
Syed Ali Husain ◽  
Zhezhen Jin ◽  
Corey Brennan ◽  
Sumit Mohan
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Preemptive Transplantation

Background and objectivesLong wait times for deceased donor kidneys and low rates of preemptive wait-listing have limited preemptive transplantation in the United States. We aimed to assess trends in preemptive deceased donor transplantation with the introduction of the new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) in 2014 and identify whether key disparities in preemptive transplantation have changed.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe identified adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in the United States from 2000 to 2018 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Preemptive transplantation was defined as no dialysis before transplant. Associations between recipient, donor, transplant, and policy era characteristics and preemptive transplantation were calculated using logistic regression. To test for modification by KAS policy era, an interaction term between policy era and each characteristic of interest was introduced in bivariate and adjusted models.ResultsThe proportion of preemptive transplants increased after implementation of KAS from 9.0% to 9.8%, with 1.10 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06 to 1.14) times higher odds of preemptive transplantation post-KAS compared with pre-KAS. Preemptive recipients were more likely to be white, older, female, more educated, hold private insurance, and have ESKD cause other than diabetes or hypertension. Policy era significantly modified the association between preemptive transplantation and race, age, insurance status, and Human Leukocyte Antigen zero-mismatch (interaction P<0.05). Medicare patients had a significantly lower odds of preemptive transplantation relative to private insurance holders (pre-KAS adjusted OR, [aOR] 0.26; [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.27], to 0.20 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.22] post-KAS). Black and Hispanic patients experienced a similar phenomenon (aOR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.51] to 0.41 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.45] and 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.47] to 0.40 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.46] respectively) compared with white patients.ConclusionsAlthough the proportion of deceased donor kidney transplants performed preemptively increased slightly after KAS, disparities in preemptive kidney transplantation persisted after the 2014 KAS policy changes and were exacerbated for racial minorities and Medicare patients.

scholarly journals Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 2900-2911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. King ◽  
S. Ali Husain ◽  
Jesse D. Schold ◽  
Rachel E. Patzer ◽  
Peter P. Reese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney ◽  
Living Donor Transplantation ◽  
Donor Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundGeographic disparities in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation persist in the United States under the Kidney Allocation System (KAS) introduced in 2014, and the effect of transplant center practices on the probability of transplantation for wait-listed patients remains unclear.MethodsTo compare probability of transplantation across centers nationally and within donation service areas (DSAs), we conducted a registry study that included all United States incident adult kidney transplant candidates wait listed in 2011 and 2015 (pre-KAS and post-KAS cohorts comprising 32,745 and 34,728 individuals, respectively). For each center, we calculated the probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation within 3 years of wait listing using competing risk regression, with living donor transplantation, death, and waiting list removal as competing events. We examined associations between center-level and DSA-level characteristics and the adjusted probability of transplant.ResultsCandidates received deceased donor kidney transplants within 3 years of wait listing more frequently post-KAS (22%) than pre-KAS (19%). Nationally, the probability of transplant varied 16-fold between centers, ranging from 4.0% to 64.2% in the post-KAS era. Within DSAs, we observed a median 2.3-fold variation between centers, with up to ten-fold and 57.4 percentage point differences. Probability of transplantation was correlated in the post-KAS cohort with center willingness to accept hard-to-place kidneys (r=0.55, P<0.001) and local organ supply (r=0.44, P<0.001).ConclusionsLarge differences in the adjusted probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation persist under KAS, even between centers working with the same local organ supply. Probability of transplantation is significantly associated with organ offer acceptance patterns at transplant centers, underscoring the need for greater understanding of how centers make decisions about organs offered to wait-listed patients and how they relate to disparities in access to transplantation.

scholarly journals Regional Disparities in Transplantation With Deceased Donor Kidneys With Kidney Donor Profile Index Less Than 20% Among Candidates With Top 20% Estimated Post Transplant Survival

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ali Husain ◽  
Kristen L. King ◽  
Geoffrey K. Dube ◽  
Demetra Tsapepas ◽  
David J. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Kidney Donor ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Transplant Survival ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney

Introduction: The Kidney Allocation System in the United States prioritizes candidates with Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) ≤20% to receive deceased donor kidneys with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) ≤20%. Research Question: We compared access to KDPI ≤ 20% kidneys for EPTS ≤ 20% candidates across the United States to determine whether geographic disparities in access to these low KDPI kidneys exist. Design: We identified all incident adult deceased donor kidney candidates wait-listed January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2018, using United Network for Organ Sharing data. We calculated the proportion of candidates transplanted, final EPTS, and KDPI of transplanted kidneys for candidates listed with EPTS ≤ 20% versus >20%. We compared the odds of receiving a KDPI ≤ 20% deceased donor kidney for EPTS ≤ 20% candidates across regions using logistic regression. Results: Among 121 069 deceased donor kidney candidates, 28.5% had listing EPTS ≤ 20%. Of these, 16.1% received deceased donor kidney transplants (candidates listed EPTS > 20%: 17.1% transplanted) and 12.3% lost EPTS ≤ 20% status. Only 49.4% of transplanted EPTS ≤ 20% candidates received a KDPI ≤ 20% kidney, and 48.3% of KDPI ≤ 20% kidneys went to recipients with EPTS > 20% at the time of transplantation. Odds of receiving a KDPI ≤ 20% kidney were highest in region 6 and lowest in region 9 (odds ratio 0.19 [0.13 to 0.28]). The ratio of KDPI ≤ 20% donors per EPTS ≤ 20% candidate and likelihood of KDPI ≤ 20% transplantation were strongly correlated ( r 2 = 0.84). Discussion: Marked geographic variation in the likelihood of receiving a KDPI ≤ 20% deceased donor kidney among transplanted EPTS ≤ 20% candidates exists and is related to differences in organ availability within allocation borders. Policy changes to improve organ sharing are needed to improve equity in access to low KDPI kidneys.

scholarly journals Endogenous intronic antisense long non-coding RNA, MGAT3-AS1, and kidney transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Subagini Nagarajah ◽  
Shengqiang Xia ◽  
Marianne Rasmussen ◽  
Martin Tepel
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplantation ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Delayed Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Donor Kidney ◽  
Non Coding Rna ◽  
Deceased Donor Kidney ◽  
Long Non Coding Rna

Abstract β-1,4-mannosylglycoprotein 4-β-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase (MGAT3) is a key molecule for the innate immune system. We tested the hypothesis that intronic antisense long non-coding RNA, MGAT3-AS1, can predict delayed allograft function after kidney transplantation. We prospectively assessed kidney function and MGAT3-AS1 in 129 incident deceased donor kidney transplant recipients before and after transplantation. MGAT3-AS1 levels were measured in mononuclear cells using qRT-PCR. Delayed graft function was defined by at least one dialysis session within 7 days of transplantation. Delayed graft function occurred in 22 out of 129 transplant recipients (17%). Median MGAT3-AS1 after transplantation was significantly lower in patients with delayed graft function compared to patients with immediate graft function (6.5 × 10−6, IQR 3.0 × 10−6 to 8.4 × 10−6; vs. 8.3 × 10−6, IQR 5.0 × 10−6 to 12.8 × 10−6; p < 0.05). The median preoperative MGAT3-AS1 was significantly lower in kidney recipients with delayed graft function (5.1 × 10−6, IQR, 2.4 × 10−6 to 6.8 × 10−6) compared to recipients with immediate graft function (8.9 × 10−6, IQR, 6.8 × 10−6 to 13.4 × 10−6; p < 0.05). Receiver-operator characteristics showed that preoperative MGAT3-AS1 predicted delayed graft function (area under curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.00; p < 0.01). We observed a positive predictive value of 0.57, and a negative predictive value of 0.95. Long non-coding RNA, MGAT3-AS1, indicates short-term outcome in patients with deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document