Spatiotemporal trends and prognosis of end-stage renal disease patients with biopsy-proven immunoglobulin A nephropathy in France from 2010 to 2014

Background Although end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is frequently used as an outcome marker for primary immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), the clinical course after reaching ESRD is not well documented. This study examined patients’ characteristics and survival in ESRD-related biopsy-proven IgAN in France. Methods French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Registry data from 2010 to 2014 were used to analyse patients’ survival and outcome in incident ESRD patients >16 years of age with biopsy-proven primary IgAN, in comparison with other primary and secondary glomerulonephritis (GN), adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) or diabetes. Multivariable survival analysis was adjusted for age, sex, time on dialysis and comorbidities. Results Among 17 138 incident dialysis patients with ESRD, IgAN (242.8/10 000 dialysis initiation) represents the most common GN related to ESRD during 2010. IgAN patients were the youngest, and had the fewest comorbidities and the highest use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) (17%). In comparison with the haemodialysis group, hazard ratios for death were not different in the preemptive transplantation group [0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–1.28] and in the PD group (0.77, 95% CI 0.44–1.33). Mortality rates in IgAN patients with preemptive transplantation and in those receiving dialysis waiting for transplantation were 2.9% (95% CI 0.0–5.6) and 6.7% (95% CI 0.9–12.3). Mortality rates of ADPKD patients receiving dialysis waiting for transplantation were higher (18%, 95% CI 3.1–30.6). Conclusion IgAN has the best prognosis among primary and secondary GN. IgAN patients receiving dialysis waiting transplantation seem to have a more favourable prognosis than ADPKD patients, who usually comprise the reference population. The underlying reasons for the difference in access treatment modalities should be investigated to improve survival with respect to renal disease.

Trends in Disparities in Preemptive Kidney Transplantation in the United States

Background and objectivesLong wait times for deceased donor kidneys and low rates of preemptive wait-listing have limited preemptive transplantation in the United States. We aimed to assess trends in preemptive deceased donor transplantation with the introduction of the new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) in 2014 and identify whether key disparities in preemptive transplantation have changed.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe identified adult deceased donor kidney transplant recipients in the United States from 2000 to 2018 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Preemptive transplantation was defined as no dialysis before transplant. Associations between recipient, donor, transplant, and policy era characteristics and preemptive transplantation were calculated using logistic regression. To test for modification by KAS policy era, an interaction term between policy era and each characteristic of interest was introduced in bivariate and adjusted models.ResultsThe proportion of preemptive transplants increased after implementation of KAS from 9.0% to 9.8%, with 1.10 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.06 to 1.14) times higher odds of preemptive transplantation post-KAS compared with pre-KAS. Preemptive recipients were more likely to be white, older, female, more educated, hold private insurance, and have ESKD cause other than diabetes or hypertension. Policy era significantly modified the association between preemptive transplantation and race, age, insurance status, and Human Leukocyte Antigen zero-mismatch (interaction P<0.05). Medicare patients had a significantly lower odds of preemptive transplantation relative to private insurance holders (pre-KAS adjusted OR, [aOR] 0.26; [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.27], to 0.20 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.22] post-KAS). Black and Hispanic patients experienced a similar phenomenon (aOR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.51] to 0.41 [95% CI, 0.37 to 0.45] and 0.43 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.47] to 0.40 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.46] respectively) compared with white patients.ConclusionsAlthough the proportion of deceased donor kidney transplants performed preemptively increased slightly after KAS, disparities in preemptive kidney transplantation persisted after the 2014 KAS policy changes and were exacerbated for racial minorities and Medicare patients.