Modulation of serum BDNF levels in postherpetic neuralgia following pulsed radiofrequency of intercostal nerve and pregabalin

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashok Kumar Saxena ◽  
Kavitha Lakshman ◽  
Tusha Sharma ◽  
Neha Gupta ◽  
Basu Dev Banerjee ◽  
...  
BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehua Huang ◽  
Yanfeng Ma ◽  
Weimin Wang ◽  
Yunxiu Guo ◽  
Bo Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is common in elderly patients and can be alleviated by pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). However, PRF treatments display different efficacy on different nerves. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided PRF modulation on thoracic dorsal root ganglion (DRG) or intercostal nerve (ICN) for PHN in aged patients and to provide a theoretical basis for clinical treatment. Methods We classified aged patients into two groups, DRG group and ICN group, based on the needle tip position. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and concise health status questionnaire (Short-form 36 health/survey questionnaire, SF-36) were used to evaluate the pain intensity and the life quality of the patients before and 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the PRF treatments. We also recorded the adverse reactions during the treatments. Results After the PRF treatment, the scores of VAS and SF-36 (assessing general health perception, social function, emotional role, mental health, and pain) improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.05). The mean VAS score in the DRG group was significantly lower than that in the ICN group 2 weeks after treatment, and remained for 12 weeks. The SF-36 scores in the DRG group were significantly higher than those in the ICN group (P < 0.05). We found a similar incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions PRF therapy is safe and effective for elderly patients with postherpetic neuralgia. However, PRF treatment in dorsal root ganglion is superior to that in intercostal nerve with improving VAS and SF-36 scores to a greater extent in older patients. Trial registration ChiCTR2100044176.


2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Hak Lee ◽  
Tae Yoon Kim ◽  
Soo Ho Ha ◽  
Young Eun Kwon ◽  
Chae Sik Yoon

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Wang ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
ShaoLong Han ◽  
LingZhi Yu

Objective. PainVision device was a developed application for the evaluation of pain intensity. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with pharmacological therapy in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). We also discussed the correlation of the measurements.Method. Forty patients with PHN were randomized for treatment with PRF combined with pharmacological therapy (PRF group,n=20) or pharmacological therapy (control group,n=20) at postoperative 48 hours. The efficacy measure was pain degree (PD) that was assessed by PainVision and visual analog scale (VAS), short form Mcgill pain questionnaire (SF-Mcgill), and numeric rate scale sleep interference score (NRSSIS). Correlations between PD, VAS, SF-Mcgill, and NRSSIS were determined.Results. The PD for persistent pain (PP) and breakthrough pain (BTP) at postoperative 48 hours assessed by PainVision were significantly lower in PRF group than in control group (PD-PP,P<0.01; PD-BTP,P<0.01). PD and VAS were highly correlated for both persistent pain (r=0.453,ρ=0.008) and breakthrough pain (r=0.64,ρ=0.001).Conclusion. PRF was well tolerated and superior to isolated pharmacological therapy in the treatment of PHN. PainVision device showed great value in the evaluation of pain intensity and PD had an excellent correlation with VAS and SF-Mcgill.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1;16 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
Wang Yingwei

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is often refractory to existing treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is known to be effective for treating neuropathic pain. In common, the targets of PRF treatment were the segmental dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons responsible for the pain. A potential complication that can occasionally occur with PRF treatment is damage to the adjacent tissue and organ. The effectiveness of the angulus costae as a puncture site for PRF has not been tested in thoracic PHN treatment. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of PRF for treating thoracic PHN through the puncture of the angulus costae. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Setting: Department of Anesthesiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Methods: Ninety-six patients with thoracic (T2-11) PHN were equally randomized assigned into 2 groups. The electrode needle punctured through the angulus costae of each patient guided by x-ray; PRF at 42°C for 120 seconds was applied after inducing paresthesia involving the affected dermatome area. PRF was applied in the PRF group (n = 48) twice. It was also applied in the sham group (n = 48) twice without radiofrequency energy output. The treatment was done once a week for 3 weeks. Tramadol was used for flare pain when the visual analog scale (VAS) ≥ 3. Outcomes Assessment: The therapeutic effect was evaluated by VAS, SF-36 health survey questionnaire, side effects (type, frequency, and onset time) before treatment, at days 3, 7, and 14, and at months one, 2, 3 and 6 after PRF. The average of tramadol (mg/d) administrated within the first month after treatment was also recorded. Results: The postprocedure VAS scores in the PRF group were significantly lower than those in the sham group and lasted for 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05). The SF-36 score, such as physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health perceptions, social function, emotional role, and mental health index were significantly improved until 6 months after treatment in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P < 0.01-0.05). The average dosage of tramadol administered (mg/d) within the first month after treatment was also significantly reduced in the PRF group compared to the sham group (P < 0.05). There were no obvious signs of pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, or other severe side effects in either group (P > 0.05). Limitations: Single center study, relatively small number of patients. Conclusions: The strategy that the angulus costae be used as the PRF puncture point of an electrode needle and the final localization of the needle tip as determined by sensory testing is an effective and safe therapeutic alternative for thoracic PHN treatment. Benefits include that the procedure is minimally invasive, provides short-term pain relief, and improves quality of life. Clinical Trial Registration: NO ISRCTN25588650. Key words: Thoracic, postherpetic neuralgia, pulsed radiofrequency, angulus costae


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1017-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Y. Makharita ◽  
Hanaa M. El Bendary ◽  
Zainab M. Sonbul ◽  
Salma E.S. Ahmed ◽  
Mahmoud A. Latif

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document