Optimal Reduction of Project Risk Severity: A Case Study

Author(s):  
Nael Zabel ◽  
Maged Georgy ◽  
Moheeb Ibrahim
IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Amir Farmahini Farahani ◽  
Kaveh Khalili-Damghani ◽  
Hosein Didehkhani ◽  
Amir Homayoun Sarfaraz ◽  
Mehdi Hajirezaie

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Brinkhoff ◽  
Malin Norin ◽  
Jenny Norrman ◽  
Lars Rosén ◽  
Kristine Ek

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Ayala-Cruz

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the implementation and testing of a modified project risk management framework that integrates PMI’s framework with Monte Carlo simulation to improve the effectiveness in high-tech new product development (NPD) projects. Design/methodology/approach The modified framework considers three bodies of knowledge: project management, risk management, and Monte Carlo simulation to produce an enhance project risk management framework. Its application is shown through a case study. Findings Using the integrated framework in a recent case study project and prior NPD projects measures (as benchmarks), it was shown that it could help to enhance risk responses caused by task durations and costs’ uncertainties. The framework proved to be better than segregated generic best practices and was key in providing insight to the issue of early project risk assessment. Research limitations/implications More experimental replications are required for enhancement effectiveness assertions of the framework, through the application of the framework to similar case studies. Furthermore, this could improve its reliability and soundness. Practical implications Future directions for research could include case and empirical studies that include hypothesis’s testing, and the integration of optimization procedure for improved NPD project’s planning and execution. Originality/value This paper outlines a way to close the gap of project risks management planning in NPD’s initiatives. It was motivated by a relatively new tendency in exploring integrated frameworks to deal with complex project risks issues.


2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 6362-6368
Author(s):  
Yan Zhang ◽  
Chang Jiang Liu

In the field of engineering and construction, unqualified construction quality, time delays, cost more than expected phenomena to occur. Because of these characteristics such as its large-scale construction projects, long cycle, the production of single and complex, there is greater risk than the production of general products, the risk increases the difficulty of construction project management, operating costs and the possibility of potential losses, therefore, risk management emerged and become an increasingly important integral part of project management. In this paper, fuzzy analytic hierarchy be used to construction project risk assessment, and to order the sort of each risk in order to prevent significant risks. On an actual project - the new stadium construction in Weifang City risk management case study, the reduction of risk of project failure is expected, but also the project is hoped for other industries to provide some reference for risk management.


2015 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 24-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Gładysz ◽  
Dariusz Skorupka ◽  
Dorota Kuchta ◽  
Artur Duchaczek

2010 ◽  
Vol 458 ◽  
pp. 131-136
Author(s):  
Jing Jing Lu ◽  
Xuan Xi Ning

Monto-Carlo method is widely used for project risk analysis. Evaluating the risk in HR (Human Resources) investment project, which is of hi-investment and hi-return, by Monto-carlo method is a new attempt. In this paper, by taking cost, profit and risk in the HR investment as index, emulation model of HR investment and index function of risk evaluation were established. Simulation about the whole investment course was done by computer program using Monto-Carlo method. Case study of HR investment risk evaluation was done later using concrete data.


Author(s):  
Goutam Dutta

This case should be taught after (A) case. This case study discusses how the stakeholders of the (A) can sit together can discuss prepare first the activities of the project, draw the network diagram, develop a critical path. The discussion further proceeds when these stakeholders through the discussion develop risk sources, assigns probabilities and computes the impact and likelihood rating.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document