Hook plate versus locking plate: Functional outcome of Neer’s type ii lateral end clavicle fractures

Purpose: Fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle is well known to decrease nonunion, malunion and shoulder disability as compared to nonoperative treatment. This study was done to compare the clinical and functional outcome of group 1 clavicle fractures treated with anatomic locking plates (ALP) versus Titanium elastic nail (TEN). Methods: We studied patients presenting with displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with ALP or TEN. The study period was from Jan 2013 to Dec 2016. Patients were reviewed and at each visit clinical and radiological progress of union was noted, complications if any were noted, functional assessment was done using the quick Dash score and Constant Murley score. Results: A total of 116 patients met our inclusion criteria. 62 patients were treated with TEN and 54 with ALP. Bony union was achieved at an average of 11.8 weeks in the TENS group and 12.8 weeks in the ALP group post operatively and this was found to be significant. The mean postoperative Constant Murley score in the ALP and the TEN groups were 92.8 (range 80–97), and 93.7 (82–97) respectively. The mean postoperative quick dash score in the ALP and TEN groups were 2.48(range from 0 to 6.8) and 2.1 (range 0–9.1) respectively. Conclusion: Both Anatomical locking plate and TEN are good options for the treatment of non-comminuted mid clavicular fractures as they have a similar functional outcome. TEN nail insertion has the advantage of being minimally invasive, having a faster union time and may be recommended in midshaft clavicle fractures without comminution.

Download Full-text

Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-019-1518-x ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Liang Li ◽

Tian-yan Li ◽

Peichao Jiang ◽

Guizhen Lin ◽

Hongxiao Wu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Shoulder Joint ◽

Locking Plate ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Hook Plate ◽

Type Ii ◽

Distal Clavicle ◽

Plate Group ◽

Clavicle Fractures ◽

Distal Clavicle Fractures ◽

Clavicle Hook Plate

Abstract Background The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clavicle hook plates versus distal clavicle locking plates for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. Methods PubMed (1996 to January 2019), Embase (1980 to January 2019), Web of Science (1990 to January 2019), the Cochrane Library (January 2019), and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (January 2019) were systematically searched without language restrictions for literature retrieval. The Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score at 3 and 6 months after the operation and the postoperative complications after the operation (shoulder joint pain, abduction restriction, fracture delay healing, subacromial impingement) were the outcomes. Stata 12.0 was used for the meta-analysis. Results A total of 9 clinical trials involving 446 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the improvement in the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function score in the distal locking plate group was better than that in the clavicle hook plate group at 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). There were fewer cases of shoulder joint pain and restricted shoulder abduction range of motion in the distal locking plate group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in fracture delay healing and subacromial impingement between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the clavicular hook plate, the distal clavicle locking plate for the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures is associated with better shoulder function recovery and fewer complications related to pain and abduction restriction.

Download Full-text

Clinical Results of Treatment Using a Clavicular Hook Plate Versus a T-plate in Neer Type II Distal Clavicle Fractures

Orthopedics ◽

10.3928/01477447-20120725-18 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 35 (8) ◽

pp. e1191-e1197 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Hong-Lve Tan ◽

Jin-Kun Zhao ◽

Chen Qian ◽

Yan Shi ◽

Qi Zhou

Keyword(s):

Clinical Results ◽

Hook Plate ◽

Plate Versus ◽

Type Ii ◽

Distal Clavicle ◽

Results Of Treatment ◽

Clavicular Hook Plate ◽

Clavicle Fractures ◽

Distal Clavicle Fractures

Download Full-text

Treatment of distal clavicle fracture of Neer type II with locking plate in combination with titanium cable under the guide

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-84601-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jun Wang ◽

Jie Guan ◽

Minbo Liu ◽

Yongfeng Cui ◽

Yuhang Zhang

Keyword(s):

Locking Plate ◽

Clavicle Fracture ◽

Operation Time ◽

Hook Plate ◽

Type Ii ◽

Distal Clavicle ◽

Distal Clavicle Fracture ◽

Plate Group ◽

Clavicle Fractures ◽

Distal Clavicle Fractures

AbstractTo observe and compare the curative effect of a locking plate plus titanium cable under the Guide device and clavicular hook plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. A prospective cohort study was conducted to analyse the clinical data of 36 patients with distal clavicle fractures from January 2016 to January 2019. The results were analysed. According to the random number method, the patients were divided into two groups: the titanium cable group (fixed with a titanium cable in combination with a locking plate) and hook plate group (fixed with a clavicular hook plate only). Under the guidance of a special device (for which a patent was obtained), in the titanium cable group, the coracoclavicular ligament was fixed with tension reduction, and then the distal clavicular fracture was fixed with a locking plate. In the hook plate group, the distal clavicle fracture was fixed with a hook plate. The incision length, operation time, bleeding volume and VAS score before, 1 week after and 1 year after the operation were compared between the two groups. The effect of the operation was evaluated by the Constant-Murley score before and 1 year after the operation. X-ray films were taken 2 days, 3 months, half a year and 1 year after the operation to observe the reduction and healing of fractures. At the same time, complications were recorded. The amount of bleeding was the same in the two groups. The operation time in the hook plate group was relatively short, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS score in the titanium cable group was significantly lower than that in the hook plate group one year after the operation. The Constant-Murley score in the titanium cable group and hook plate group was significantly higher 1 year after the operation. The number of postoperative complications in the titanium cable group was significantly lower than that in the hook plate group. The treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures with a titanium cable plus a locking plate has a good curative effect, few complications and good postoperative recovery and thus is worth popularizing.

Download Full-text