scholarly journals Analysis of COVID 19 Infection in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant Patients in Pandemic Hospital: What Has the Last Year Taught Us?

Author(s):  
nurettin ay ◽  
Ramazan Danis ◽  
Jehat Kılıc ◽  
Derya Deniz Altıntaş

Objective: This study aims to investigate the mortality factors in hemodialysis patients and kidney transplant patients with COVID-19 patients. Method: The demographic, clinic, laboratory, and radiologic signs of the kidney transplant and hemodialysis patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between 11 March 2020-11 March 2021 were evaluated. Results: To this study, 72 hemodialysis (median age, 57.5 Q1-Q3:43-65; female:36/50%) and 58 kidney transplant (median age, 44.5 Q1-Q3:28.75-55.25; female:21/36.2%) were included. Fifteen HD patients (20.8%) died. To identify the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using the variables in the univariate analyses including age, female gender, diabetes mellitus, ferritin, d-dimer, albumin, CRP, procalcitonin, dyspnea. Age (OR:1.12, 95% [CI]: 1.03-1.21, p=0.004), and dyspnea (OR: 9,7 95% CI 1.80-52.2, p=0.008) were found to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Nine (15.5%) of transplant patients died. The median time from the beginning of symptoms to the time of admission was 3 days (2-5). And this rate was 2 (2-3) and 5 (4-5.75) days, respectively, for patients followed up in our center and the external centers (p<0.001). Although an increase in CRP, ferritin, D-dimer levels, dyspnea, and bilateral involvement in CT images was statistically significant in the univariate analysis, no single factor was found to be related to mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Both HD and renal transplant patients should be followed closely. Early admission of HD and RT patients might be life-saving when suspected. Early inclusion of these patients into the vaccination program might reduce mortality. However, large-scale prospective randomized studies are needed.

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávio Geraldo Rezende Freitas ◽  
Fábio Lombardi ◽  
Eduardo Souza Pacheco ◽  
Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas ◽  
Laila Almeida Viana ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is a paucity of data regarding the complications in kidney transplant patients who may require intensive care unit (ICU) management, despite being the most common solid organ transplant worldwide. Objective: To identify the main reasons for ICU admission and to determine the factors associated with hospital mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Design: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted between September 2013 and June 2014, including all consecutive kidney transplant patients requiring ICU admission. We collected data on patient demographics, transplant characteristics, clinical data, and prognostic scores. The independent determinants of hospital mortality were identified by multiple logistic regression analysis. We also assessed the performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores. Results: We analyzed data from 413 patients, the majority of whom were admitted late after renal transplantation (1169 days; 63-3003 days). The main reason for admission was sepsis (33.2%), followed by cardiovascular disease (16%). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.05, confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09), SAPS 3 score (OR 1.04, CI, 1.01-1.08), the need for mechanical ventilation (OR 26.47, CI, 10.30-68.08), and vasopressor use (OR 3.34, CI, 1.37-8.13) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The performance of SAPS 3 and APACHE II scores was poor in this population and overestimated the mortality rates. Conclusion: Sepsis was the main reason for ICU admission in kidney transplant recipients, followed by cardiovascular disease. Age and disease severity were associated with hospital mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Atbee ◽  
Saad Shaheen Al-Taher ◽  
Majid Alabbood

Background: Up to date, there is no consensus on the best combination of direct-acting antiviral to treat hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant recipients. Objective: This study aims to analyze the efficacy of combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir regimen for treatment of hepatitis C virus infected kidney transplant patients. Method: A cross-sectional study conducted in a nephrology clinic and the Nephrology Center in Basrah Teaching Hospital from June 2015 to June 2018. Ledifos (90 mg Ledipasvir and 400 mg Sofosbuvir fixed-dose) was given as a single daily dose for all the participants for 12 weeks. Response for therapy was tested by follow up hepatitis C virus load at the end of 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The sustained virological response was defined as negative viral load of hepatitis C virus (aviremia) at the end of therapy. This study was done according to the Helsinki Congress. Results: A total of 60 (16 females) patients with renal transplantation and hepatitis C virus infection were included. Mean age was 40±6.2 years. A sustained virological response observed in all of the patients who received Ledifos after 12 and 24 weeks of therapy for all genotypes (1a, 1b and 4); p= 0.0001. Genotype 1a was more prevalent among males, 34 (56.6%); p= 0.0001, and it was the most common genotype tested negative serologically, 11 (18.3%). Conclusion: Ledifos therapy is effective and safe option for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in the post–renal transplant setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document