scholarly journals The future of transcatheter antitumor therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 135-137
Author(s):  
D. Masulovic ◽  
M. Milicevic ◽  
R. Stevic ◽  
D. Sagic ◽  
Dj. Saranovic ◽  
...  

Transcatheter antitumor therapy very quickly accepted during the last decade and their importance in the treatment of oncology patients will be increasing. By improvement of new targeted agents, which can be given intraarterial or systemic, efficiency of transcatheteric therapeutic approaches can be drastically increased. Numerous clinical trials (study phase I / II / III) relating to the synergy of two antitumor therapeutic approaches are already in progress. Preliminary results of these trials are already very encouraging. Further improvement in the development of specific therapeutics antitumor drugs and systemic applications will be a big step in the quest for medication against malignant tumors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Austin G. Duffy ◽  
Chi Ma ◽  
Susanna Varkey Ulahannan ◽  
Suzanne Fioravanti ◽  
Aradhana Venkatesan ◽  
...  

211 Background: Endoglin (CD105), is an endothelial cell membrane receptor highly expressed on proliferating tumor vasculature, including in HCC. CD105 is essential for angiogenesis and its expression is upregulated by hypoxia and VEGF inhibition. TRC105 is a chimeric IgG1 anti-CD105 monoclonal antibody that acts by endothelial cell growth inhibition, ADCC and apoptosis. Methods: Preclinical: Murine BNL HCC cells were grown subcutaneously in wildtype Balb/c mice and treated with antibody to murine CD105, (clone MJ7/18; 10-200ug) ± sorafenib (10 mg/kg daily p.o.) or sorafenib alone. Clinical: Patients with HCC (Childs Pugh A/B7), ECOG 0/1, were enrolled in a phase I study of TRC105 at 3, 6, 10, 15mg/kg q 2wks plus sorafenib 400mg bid; or (if sorafenib-refractory) a phase II study of TRC105 at 10 or 15mg/kg q 2wks. Correlative biomarkers: DCE-MRI; FDG-PET; color Doppler ultrasonography; circulating endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells, plasma levels of angiogenic factors; soluble CD105 and tumor IHC for CD105. Results: Preclinical studies: CD105 expression was increased in BNL HCC tumors of mice treated with sorafenib. Anti-CD105 + sorafenib was more effective than sorafenib alone. Clinical trials (N=16): M:F 13:3; Median age = 55 (range 24-67); Phase I with sorafenib (N=8): 1 DLT (increased AST) occurred at 10mg/kg. The most frequent toxicity has been epistaxis. One patient with coronary stenosis developed a fatal MI and one patient with thrombocytopenia developed G3 cerebral tumor hemorrhage. Phase II (N=8): No grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities . Most frequent toxicities headache (G2; N=3) and epistaxis (G1; N=4). No patient was progression free at 4 months. Median time on study: Phase I- 4 months; Phase II - 2 months. Preliminary evidence of biologic response seen on DCE-MRI in 1pt (of 3 evaluable) with a reduction in Ktrans and kep and 3pts (of 3 evaluable) with reduction in intra-tumoral color flow on Doppler. Conclusions: TRC105 is well tolerated both as single agent and combined with sorafenib. Evidence of biological activity was observed. Full preclinical, clinical and correlative data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01306058, NCT01375569.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert N. Mcburney ◽  
Wade M Hines ◽  
Linda S. Von Tungeln ◽  
Laura K. Schnackenberg ◽  
Richard D. Beger ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8551-8551
Author(s):  
Haby Adel Henary ◽  
David S. Hong ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
Goldy George ◽  
...  

8551 Background: Identification of activating mutations in melanoma has increased the number of novel targeted agents for this disease. Methods: Weretrospectively reviewed clinical outcomes of 160 consecutive metastatic melanoma patients (pts) treated in the Dept of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I program) at M. D. Anderson since 2008, and compared their median progression free survival (PFS) to their first and last standard systemic therapy PFS. In addition, we compared those pts’ outcomes tested for tumor molecular aberrations on a phase I trial with a matched targeted agent with those of pts who were treated without regard for their molecular profiles. Results: Of 160 pts treated on 35 different phase 1 clinical trials, 110 pts (69%) had ≥ 1 molecular aberration. Of those pts who had adequate tissue for molecular analysis, 63% (85/134) pts had BRAF mutation, 20% (22/109) NRAS mutation, 20% (1/5) GNAQ mutation, 11% (1/9) P53 mutation, 2.5% (1/39) PIK3CA and 1.3% (1/76) had KIT mutation. 77 (48%) pts were treated on a phase I trial with a matched targeted agent and 83 (52%) pts were treated on a non-matched phase 1 trial. The overall response rate was 39% (complete response [CR], 9%; partial response [PR], 30%) in the 77 pts treated with matched therapy and 9% (all PRs) in the 83 pts treated without matched therapy (P = 0.0018). 139 (87%) pts received at least one systemic therapy before referral to phase I, median PFS was longer on phase 1 therapy than on last line standard therapy prior to referral to phase 1 (4.2 vs. 2.8 months, P = 0.002). Median PFS was greater for pts on matched vs. non-matched therapy (5.3 vs. 3.7 months, log rank P = 0.004). Also, median PFS was longer on phase 1 matched trial than on first standard treatment (5.3 vs. 3.9 months, log rank P = 0.045).PFS did not differ between first standard and non-matched phase 1 study. Univariate analyses with the log rank test revealed that matched therapy (P = 0.004) was positively associated with longer PFS on phase I clinical trials. Conclusions: Matching melanoma pts with targeted drugsbased on specific molecular aberrations in the phase I setting can be associated with superior outcomes compared to prior standard systemic therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document