scholarly journals Deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer after conserving surgery: Dose reduction for organs at risk

2019 ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Drazan Jaros ◽  
Goran Kolarevic ◽  
Milovan Savanovic ◽  
Slavica Maric
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold

scholarly journals Effects of deep inspiration breath hold on prone photon or proton irradiation of breast and regional lymph nodes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Speleers ◽  
Max Schoepen ◽  
Francesca Belosi ◽  
Vincent Vakaet ◽  
Wilfried De Neve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Proton Radiotherapy ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold

AbstractWe report on a comparative dosimetrical study between deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and shallow breathing (SB) in prone crawl position for photon and proton radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and locoregional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_MI). We investigate the dosimetrical effects of DIBH in prone crawl position on organs-at-risk for both photon and proton plans. For each modality, we further estimate the effects of lung and heart doses on the mortality risks of different risk profiles of patients. Thirty-one patients with invasive carcinoma of the left breast and pathologically confirmed positive lymph node status were included in this study. DIBH significantly decreased dose to heart for photon and proton radiotherapy. DIBH also decreased lung doses for photons, while increased lung doses were observed using protons because the retracting heart is displaced by low-density lung tissue. For other organs-at-risk, DIBH resulted in significant dose reductions using photons while minor differences in dose deposition between DIBH and SB were observed using protons. In patients with high risks for cardiac and lung cancer mortality, average thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 3.12% (photon DIBH), 4.03% (photon SB), 1.80% (proton DIBH) and 1.66% (proton SB). The radiation-related mortality risk could not outweigh the ~ 8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_MI radiotherapy in any of the assessed treatments.

Deep-inspiration breath hold radiotherapy in patients with left-sided breast cancer after partial mastectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Left Lung ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Partial Mastectomy ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiation dose to organs at risk for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free-breathing (FB) radiotherapy in patients with lef-sided breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after partial mastectomy. Methods: One hundred patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent DIBH and FB planning computed tomography scans, and the 2 techniques were compared. Dose-volume histograms were analyzed for heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and left lung. Results: Radiation dose to heart, LAD, and left lung was significantly lower for DIBH than for free breathing plans. The median mean heart dose for DIBH technique in comparison with FB was 1.21 Gy, and 3.22 Gy respectively; for LAD, 4.67 versus 24.71 Gy; and for left lung 8.32 Gy versus 9.99 Gy. Conclusion: DIBH is an effective technique to reduce cardiac and lung radiation exposure.

scholarly journals Deep inspiration breath hold versus free breathing technique in mediastinal radiotherapy for lymphoma

BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20200067
Author(s):  
Orla Anne Houlihan ◽  
Guhan Rangaswamy ◽  
Mary Dunne ◽  
Christine Rohan ◽  
Louise O'Neill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Free Breathing ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Deep Inspiration ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold ◽  
The Impact

Objective: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of lymphoma and many patients with lymphoma are cured with treatment. Risk of secondary malignancy and long-term cardiac and pulmonary toxicity from mediastinal radiotherapy exists. Delivery of radiotherapy using a deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique increases lung volume and has the potential to reduce dose to heart and lungs. We undertook a prospective study to assess the dosimetric differences in DIBH and free breathing (FB) plans in patients requiring mediastinal radiotherapy in clinical practice. Methods: We performed both FB and DIBH planning scans on 35 consecutive patients with mediastinal lymphoma needing radiotherapy. Contours and plans were generated for both data sets and dosimetric data were compared. All patients were planned using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Data were compared for FB and DIBH plans with each patient acting as their own control using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: DIBH significantly reduced lung doses (mean 10.6 vs 11.4Gy, p < 0.0005; V20 16.8 vs 18.3%, p = 0.001) and spinal cord maximum dose (20.6 vs 22.8Gy, p = 0.001). DIBH increased breast V4 (38.5% vs 31.8%, p = 0.006) and mean right breast dose (4.2 vs 3.6Gy, p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in heart doses when the entire study cohort was considered, however, mean heart dose tended to be lower with DIBH for upper mediastinal (UM) tumours (4.3 vs 4.9Gy, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our study describes the potential benefit of DIBH in a population reflective of clinical practice. DIBH can decrease radiation dose to lungs, heart and spinal cord, however, may increase dose to breasts. DIBH is not always superior to FB, and the clinical significance of differences in dose to organs at risk in addition to the time required to treat patients with DIBH must be considered when deciding the most appropriate radiotherapy technique for each patient. Advances in knowledge: To our knowledge, this is the largest study comparing DIBH and FB planning for patients with lymphoma receiving mediastinal radiotherapy in clinical practice. It demonstrates the impact of an increasingly common radiotherapy technique on dose to organs at risk and the subsequent potential for long-term radiotherapy side-effects.

scholarly journals Analysis Of Dose At 3D-Crt And Imrt Techniques In Left Breast Cancer Case With Hypofractionation Using Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (Dibh)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samsun - ◽  
Muhammad Arif Arif ◽  
Gregorius Septayudha Septayudha
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Left Breast ◽  
Breath Hold ◽  
Tolerance Limits ◽  
Deep Inspiration Breath Hold ◽  
Organ At Risk ◽  
The Difference ◽  
3D Crt

Abstract In terms of breast cancer radiation treatment, it has radiation using the 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique and the continuation of the 3D-CRT technique, namely the Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) technique. This study aims to evaluate the dosage aspects of PTV and OAR between the 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques in cases of left breast cancer with hypofractionation using the Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) method using the Conformity Index (CI) and Homogeneity Index (H.I.) and H.I. organ at risk uses tolerance limits. This type of research is comparative quantitative with ten samples with primary data conducted at Siloam T.B. Hospital. Simatupang from November 2019 to April 2020. The research was carried out in the form of radiation planning with 3D-CRT techniques and IMRT techniques, and the results of planning both techniques were evaluated between 3D-CRT techniques and IMRT techniques through PTV evaluations using CI and H.I. values. Furthermore, the organs at risk use tolerance limits on each organ. The results showed the assessment between 3D-CRT and IMRT on PTV and organs at risk received different doses. The PTV shows the CI value, which is almost the same as the difference of 0.034, and there is a slight difference in H.I. with an average value in the IMRT technique of 0.07 and 3D-CRT of 0.11, and it can be seen that the IMRT is slightly superior because the excellent H.I. value is the closest to 0. Then at the dose of organ at risk received by the sample, the 3D-CRT technique is slightly superior by obtaining a lower dose that obtains the difference in the heart by 0.53%, lung by 3.46%, spinal cord by 6.51 Gy, esophagus at 4.5 Gy, and larynx at 5.18 Gy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document