The Cross-Ethnic Equivalence of Parenting and Family Interaction Measures among Hispanic and Anglo-American Families

1992 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
George P. Knight ◽  
Jenn Yun Tein ◽  
Rita Shell ◽  
Mark Roosa
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Ponterotto

This paper presents an analysis of the forms and functions that a normal conversational strategy like hedging can assume in an institutionalized form of discourse — in this case, the courtroom, and particularly, in a specific juridical text-type: the cross-examination of the victim-witness in a rape trial. The study aims to show principally how the defence attorney of the accused exploits the hedging strategies of the female victim-witness in order to discredit her testimony and thereby win the case for the defence. By so doing, the argumentation will make two theoretical points. The first point is disciplinary, in that it will demonstrate the powerful contribution of the language sciences to the identification and unveiling of social injustice. The second point is ideological, in that it will show how some areas of Anglo-American institutions continue to reflect a social tendency towards leniency in the face of violence against women.


2001 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Whiteside-Mansell ◽  
Robert H. Bradley ◽  
Todd D. Little ◽  
Robert Flynn Corwyn ◽  
Donna Spiker

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
A. Penney ◽  
S. M Reisman

Author(s):  
Sal Hagen ◽  
Marc Tuters ◽  
Stijn Peeters ◽  
Emillie De Keulenaar ◽  
Jack Wilson ◽  
...  

This panel brings together research into the cross-platform relations between radical Web subcultures and how they are constitutive of “hyper-antagonistic” politics in broader Web discourses. The papers share a concern with vernacular practices of “fringe” platforms favoured by an insurgent far-right movement and their relations to more “mainstream” social media. They engage with the concept of “transcoding between milieus” (Deleuze & Guattari 1987, 322) as a means to empirically describe multiple transversal processes across different strata of the Web in which “one milieu serves as the basis for another” (313). All papers ground their conceptual analysis in data-driven empirical approaches using historical datasets ranging from “mainstream” platforms like YouTube, to more “fringe” spaces like 4chan. The papers furthermore all use 4chan’s far-right /pol/ board as a reference point for a vernacular “hyper-antagonistic” style that emerged out of this period – a style that has often been related to the “alt-right”. Together, the four papers in this panel offer insights into the apparent insurgency of far-right subcultures within broader online discourse in the Anglo-American context over the course of the last half decade. Each does so with a particular focus, ranging from subcultural conflict between Tumblr and 4chan, the transcoding of the “Kekistan” meme between 4chan and YouTube, the emergence of far-right vernacular in the comments of Breitbart News, and the robustness of hyper-antagonistic discourse after deplatforming measures.


1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 616-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Patterson ◽  
Robert M. Kaplan ◽  
James F. Sallis ◽  
Philip R. Nader

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document