Administrative Law. Judicial Control. Scope of Judicial Review under Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act

1929 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 131
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Judicial Control

scholarly journals Good Governance Dalam Konteks Hukum Administrasi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Sri Nur Hari Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Regulatory Function ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
Legislative Body ◽  
Legal Writing

Abstract The research aims to determine the practice of implementing good governance in the context of administrative law. This writing is a legal writing that uses a conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the legislative body in carrying out the regulatory function must base on good / decent regulatory principles / principles by developing knowledge and skills in the field of legislation as mandated by Law Number 12 Year 2011 along with its attachments. In general, there are two main means used to assess good / decent governance, namely Procedure and Facts used in making decisions, in addition to attention to several legal principles as a manifestation of the implementation of the principle of democracy. Judicial control in overseeing government actions against decisions made, including in Judicial Review, which are repressive and prioritize the legality aspect (rechtmatigheid) of a decision. Keyword: Good governance, Administrative law. Keywords: Good Governance, Administrative Law, government  Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui praktek pelaksanaan good goveranance dalam konteks hukum administrasi. Penulisan ini merupakan penulisan hukum yang menggunakan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Badan legislatif dalam menjalankan fungsi regulasi wajib mendasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip/ asas-asas regulasi yang baik/layak dengan mengembangkan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan di bidang perundang-undangan sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 beserta lampirannya. Pada umumnya terdapat dua sarana utama yang dipergunakan untuk menilai tentang penyelenggraaan pemerintahan yang baik/layak, yakni Prosedur dan Fakta yang dipergunakan dalam mengambil keputusan, di samping perhatian terhadap beberapa prinsip hukum sebagai wujud dari pelaksanaan asas demokrasi. Kontrol peradilan dalam mengawasi tindakan pemerintah terhadap keputusan yang dibuatnya, termasuk dalam Judicial Review,  yang bersifat represif dan mengutamakan aspek legalitas (rechtmatigheid) dari suatu keputusan. Keyword : Good governance, Administrative law. Kata Kunci: Good Governance, Hukum Administrasi, pemerintahan

Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 627-652
Author(s):  
Robin Creyke
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Federal Level ◽  
Law System

Courts and tribunals have distinct roles within the Australian administrative law system at the federal level, and to a lesser extent, in the states and territories. Questions of law are for the courts, and questions of fact are for the executive and tribunals. From time to time this orthodoxy is questioned. Suggestions are made that the courts are increasingly tending to intrude into the province of tribunals. Using cases as illustrations, this article explores five relevant jurisdictional areas —from appeals on a question of law to deference under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 10(2)(b)(ii)—to test the accuracy of the suggestion.

Judicial review of Common Foreign and Security Policy by the ECtHR and the (re)negotiation on the accession of the EU to the ECHR

2021 ◽  
pp. 1023263X2198824
Author(s):  
Maria José Rangel de Mesquita
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Security Policy ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
National Courts ◽  
Foreign And Security Policy ◽  
Conclusion Section ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Eu

The article addresses the issue of judicial control of the implementation of Common Foreign and Security Policy at international regional level within the framework of the relaunching of the negotiation in view of the accession of the EU to the ECHR. Considering the extent of jurisdiction of the CJEU in respect of Common Foreign and Security Policy field in the light of its case law (sections 1 and 2), it analyses the question of judicial review of Common Foreign and Security Policy within international regional justice by the ECtHR in the light of the ongoing negotiations (section 3), in the perspective of the relationship between non-national courts (section 3.A), having as background the (2013) Draft Agreement of accession (section 3.B.1). After addressing the relaunching of the negotiation procedure (section 3.B.2) and the issue of CFSP control by the ECtHR according to the recent (re)negotiation meetings (section 3.B.3), some concrete proposals, including for the redrafting of the accession agreement, will be put forward (section 3.B.4), as well as a conclusion (section 4).

Judicial review of Common Foreign and Security Policy by the ECtHR and the (re)negotiation on the accession of the EU to the ECHR

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-370
Author(s):  
Maria José Rangel de Mesquita
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Security Policy ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
Judicial Control ◽  
National Courts ◽  
Foreign And Security Policy ◽  
Conclusion Section ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Eu

The article addresses the issue of judicial control of the implementation of Common Foreign and Security Policy at international regional level within the framework of the relaunching of the negotiation in view of the accession of the EU to the ECHR. Considering the extent of jurisdiction of the CJEU in respect of Common Foreign and Security Policy field in the light of its case law (sections 1 and 2), it analyses the question of judicial review of Common Foreign and Security Policy within international regional justice by the ECtHR in the light of the ongoing negotiations (section 3), in the perspective of the relationship between non-national courts (section 3.A), having as background the (2013) Draft Agreement of accession (section 3.B.1). After addressing the relaunching of the negotiation procedure (section 3.B.2) and the issue of CFSP control by the ECtHR according to the recent (re)negotiation meetings (section 3.B.3), some concrete proposals, including for the redrafting of the accession agreement, will be put forward (section 3.B.4), as well as a conclusion (section 4).

Liberating Malawi's Administrative Justice Jurisprudence from Its Common Law Shackles

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danwood Mzikenge Chirwa
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Right ◽  
Administrative Justice

AbstractThe 1994 Malawian Constitution is unique in that it, among other things, recognizes administrative justice as a fundamental right and articulates the notion of constitutional supremacy. This right and the idea of constitutional supremacy have important implications for Malawi's administrative law, which was hitherto based on the common law inherited from Britain. This article highlights the difficulties that Malawian courts have faced in reconciling the right to administrative justice as protected under the new constitution with the common law. In doing so, it offers some insights into what the constitutionalization of administrative justice means for Malawian administrative law. It is argued that the constitution has altered the basis and grounds for judicial review so fundamentally that the Malawian legal system's marriage to the English common law can be regarded as having irretrievably broken down as far as administrative law is concerned.

Administrative Law. Judicial Review of Order of Postmaster General

1918 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 557
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Administrative Law
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document