The policy which maximises long-term survival of an animal faced with the risks of starvation and predation

1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. McNamara

This paper presents a simple model of the decision problems which face many animals in the wild. Animals have an upper limit to the amount of energy reserves which can be stored as body fat. They constantly use energy and find food as a stochastic process. Death occurs if energy reserves fall to zero or if the animal is taken by a predator. Typically animals have a range of behavioural options which differ in the distribution of food gained and in the associated predation risk. There is often a trade-off between starvation and predation in that animals have to expose themselves to higher predation risks in order to gain more food.The above situation is modelled as a finite-state, finite-time-horizon Markov decision problem. The policy which maximises long-term survival probability is characterised. As special cases two trade-offs are analysed. It is shown that an animal should take fewer risks in terms of predation as its reserves increase, and that an animal should reduce the variability of its food supply at the expense of its mean gain as its reserves increase.

1990 ◽  
Vol 22 (02) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. McNamara

This paper presents a simple model of the decision problems which face many animals in the wild. Animals have an upper limit to the amount of energy reserves which can be stored as body fat. They constantly use energy and find food as a stochastic process. Death occurs if energy reserves fall to zero or if the animal is taken by a predator. Typically animals have a range of behavioural options which differ in the distribution of food gained and in the associated predation risk. There is often a trade-off between starvation and predation in that animals have to expose themselves to higher predation risks in order to gain more food. The above situation is modelled as a finite-state, finite-time-horizon Markov decision problem. The policy which maximises long-term survival probability is characterised. As special cases two trade-offs are analysed. It is shown that an animal should take fewer risks in terms of predation as its reserves increase, and that an animal should reduce the variability of its food supply at the expense of its mean gain as its reserves increase.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Gu

AbstractWhile gene or genome duplications have provided raw genetic materials for evolutionary innovations, these events have also generated massive duplicate genes, resulting in a tremendous increase to the genetic robustness of organism. Duplicate compensation indicate functional redundancies generated by gene duplications, which are widespread in all known genomes. However, the fitness trade-offs of their mutational compensation (genetic robustness) and their role in evolutionary innovation remains largely obscure. In this paper, we discuss how we can utilize the mathematical modeling approach to predicting under which condition duplicate compensation may occur. After a critical review for the models about expression dosage, compensation, and long-term survival of duplicate genes, we highlight the importance to distinguish between Function (F)-triggered and Expression (E)-triggered mechanism of duplicate compensation. Moreover, we address three fundamental questions: (i) Why a backup duplicate can be effectively activated by any silence mutation of the dominant duplicate, but hardly by any coding mutation resulting in impaired protein function? (ii) Why a dispensable duplicate gene, i.e., knockout leads to virtually no phenotype, still remains a great deal of selective constraints in the coding region? And (iii) under which condition expression subfunctionalization between duplicates is reversible (dosage-sharing) or irreversible (long-term survival)?


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1802-1808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashikh A. Choudhury ◽  
Dor Yoeli ◽  
Gerard Hoeltzel ◽  
Hunter B. Moore ◽  
Kas Prins ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 363-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuto Takenaka ◽  
Mine Harada ◽  
Tomoaki Fujisaki ◽  
Koji Nagafuji ◽  
Shinichi Mizuno ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A747-A748
Author(s):  
S DRESNER ◽  
A IMMMANUEL ◽  
P LAMB ◽  
S GRIFFIN

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Manuel Eisenberg ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
Rakhee H. Goel ◽  
Allan J. Pantuck ◽  
Robert A. Figlin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document