Best Practices in Intervention Research for Students with Learning Disabilities

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-239
Author(s):  
Don Deshler ◽  
Jean Schumaker
2022 ◽  
pp. 564-578
Author(s):  
Betsy Orr

The purpose of this chapter is to provide knowledge for classroom teachers on the assistive technology tools that are available for students with learning disabilities. A secondary focus is to identify the best practices commonly used by classroom teachers when teaching students with disabilities. Various technology tools and best practices are discussed. A survey was distributed to elementary and secondary classroom teachers seeking input on the assistive technology tools and best practices used in the classroom. Further discussion of the assistive technology tools and best practices provide content for the practicing teacher to enhance his/her teaching skills when teaching students with learning disabilities.


Author(s):  
Betsy Orr

The purpose of this chapter is to provide knowledge for classroom teachers on the assistive technology tools that are available for students with learning disabilities. A secondary focus is to identify the best practices commonly used by classroom teachers when teaching students with disabilities. Various technology tools and best practices are discussed. A survey was distributed to elementary and secondary classroom teachers seeking input on the assistive technology tools and best practices used in the classroom. Further discussion of the assistive technology tools and best practices provide content for the practicing teacher to enhance his/her teaching skills when teaching students with learning disabilities.


1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 198-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo A. Mastropieri ◽  
Thomas E. Scruggs

Abstract In this review, the best practices for facilitating reading comprehension for students with learning disabilities are described and summarized. these best practices were derived from the results of an extensive literature review of research in reading comprehension with students with learning disabilities. analysis of all relevant literature revealed consistently high effects for some reading comprehension strategies. strongest outcomes were observed for teacher-led questioning and self-questioning strategies, followed by text-en hancem ent strategies, and, finally, strategies involving basic skills instruction and reinforcement. the few studies that were located in the area of whole language yielded less positive outcomes. implications for effective practice are described.


2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 308-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy R. Gelbart

As schools move into a new era of technology, assessment is evolving as well. With the introduction of high-stakes tests based on the Common Core State Standards, annual assessments are increasingly delivered via computer-based systems. This method of delivery could have a significant effect on students with learning disabilities. This column explores benefits and challenges of testing students with learning disabilities via computer-based systems. It examines accessing accommodations via computer-based systems, best practices in preparing students for computer-based tests, teacher training, and educators and test designers partnering in creating test platforms.


2003 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Pedrotty Bryant ◽  
Marilyn Goodwin ◽  
Brian R. Bryant ◽  
Kellie Higgins

This article reviews research on vocabulary interventions involving students with learning disabilities. The purpose of the review was to summarize the findings of vocabulary intervention research and to present implications for vocabulary instruction. The studies were analyzed based on the following intervention research variables: word selection procedure, materials, instructional design and procedures, duration of the intervention, mastery criterion, measures of vocabulary learning (word knowledge level and reading comprehension), maintenance, and generalization (reading comprehension). Based on the selection criteria, six articles spanning the period from 1978 to the present were identified. Vocabulary interventions were categorized into four areas, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), fluency-building vocabulary practice activities, mnemonic strategy instruction, and concept enhancement instruction. Overall, positive results were found for the interventions on measures of immediate recall, maintenance, and generalization.


2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Betsy McCoach ◽  
Thomas J. Kehle ◽  
Melissa A. Bray ◽  
Del Siegle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document