The Effectiveness of Remedial Programs for Reading Disabled Children of Different Ages: Does the Benefit Decrease for Older Children?

1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen W. Lovett ◽  
Karen A. Steinbach

One hundred and twenty-two severely reading disabled children were randomly assigned to one of two word identification training programs or a study skills control program. One program remediated deficient phonological analysis and blending skills and provided direct instruction of letter-sound mappings. The other program taught children how to acquire, use, and monitor four metacognitive decoding strategies. The effectiveness of the remedial programs was evaluated for children in grades 2/3, 4, and 5/6 to determine whether programs were differentially effective at different grade levels. Both training approaches were associated with significant improvement in word identification and word attack skills and sizeable transfer-of-training effects. The phonological program resulted in greater transfer across the phonological processing domain, whereas the strategy training program produced broader transfer for real words of both regular and irregular orthography. Children at each grade level made equivalent gains with remediation. These results suggest that the phonological deficits associated with reading disability are amenable to focused and intensive remediation and that this effort is well directed across the elementary school years. From grades 2 through 6, there is no evidence of a developmental window beyond which phonological deficits cannot be effectively remediated with intensive phonological training.

2019 ◽  
Vol LXXX (4) ◽  
pp. 256-267
Author(s):  
Ewa Boksa ◽  
Renata Cuprych

Due to the fact that it is frequently difficult to identify their etiological origins, reading and writing difficulties have inconsistent terminology in the literature. This article is a review and attempts to initiate a discussion about visual dyslexia. The authors pose the question whether - in the context of new neuroimaging methods and the neurosciences broadly defined - there exist reading and writing difficulties that stem from impaired functioning of the visual system and whether they can be assigned to developmental dyslexia. If it is assumed that developmental dyslexia is linguistic in nature, these are phonological deficits that come to the fore in children entering the world of reading. These phonological processing deficits impair word decoding (word identification), making word recognition impossible, thus preventing access to higher-order linguistic processes, that is comprehending meaning from texts or building one’s own narratives.


1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Shankweiler ◽  
S. Crain ◽  
L. Katz ◽  
A.E. Fowler ◽  
A.M. Liberman ◽  
...  

A comprehensive cognitive appraisal of elementary school children with learning disabilities showed that within the language sphere, deficits associated with reading disability are selective Phonological deficits consistently accompany reading problems whether they occur in relatively pure form or in the presence of coexisting attention deficit or arithmetic disability Although reading-disabled children were also deficient in production of morphologically related forms, this difficulty stemmed in large part from the same weakness in the phonological component that underlies reading disability In contrast, tests of syntactic knowledge did not distinguish reading-disabled children from those with other cognitive disabilities, nor from normal children after covarying for intelligence


2000 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rauno K. Parrila ◽  
J.P. Das ◽  
Maureen E. Kendrick ◽  
Timothy C. Papadopoulos ◽  
John R. Kirby

Fifty-eight Grade 1 children experiencing reading difficulties were divided into two matched remediation groups: PREP (PASS Reading Enhancement Program) (see Das & Kendrick, 1997) and Meaning-Based Reading intervention. Both groups received remediation twice a week for 20 min over a 9-week period. Participants’ reading level was assessed pre- and post-intervention using Word Identification (WI) and Word Attack (WA) tests. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed a significant main effect of Testing Time for both WI and WA. For WA, the Testing Time by Remediation Group interaction was also significant; the PREP group gained more than the meaning-based group in terms of decoding skills. Next, the performance of High-Gainers and No-Gainers in both groups was compared on several cognitive processing tasks. Results indicated that High-Gainers in the PREP group were characterized by a somewhat higher level of successive processing, phonological processing, and word recognition skills at the beginning of the program. In contrast, High-Gainers in the meaning-based program were characterized by a higher level of planning, phonological processing, and visual memory. Implications for education and future directions for research on remediation are also presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry J. A. de Groot ◽  
Kees P. van den Bos ◽  
Alexander E. M. G. Minnaert ◽  
Bieuwe F. van der Meulen

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Landi ◽  
W. Einar Mencl ◽  
Stephen J. Frost ◽  
Rebecca Sandak ◽  
Helen Chen ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Patton ◽  
Donald K. Routh ◽  
Stuart I. Offenbach

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiola R. Gómez-Velázquez ◽  
Andrés A. González-Garrido ◽  
Daniel Zarabozo ◽  
J. L. Oropeza de Alba

1985 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-193
Author(s):  
Cecile L. Stein ◽  
Edgar B. Zurif ◽  
Helen S. Cairns

At the outset we wish to thank the editors of Applied Psycholinguistics for inviting us to reply to Goodluck's criticisms of our paper, “Sentence Comprehension Limitations Related to Syntactic Deficits in Reading Disabled Children” (Vol. 5, No. 4). Our response can be summarized in two points: First, the theoretical questions raised by Goodluck are largely unresolved and premature. Second, and most important, is the point that however the theoretical issues are ultimately resolved, one of the basic conclusions of the Stein, Cairns, and Zurif article remains unassailed – viz., that the interpretation of temporal complement constructions in English reveals a deficit in the grammatical System of some reading disabled children. This note will bear an organization analogous to that of Goodluck.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document