Historical Scholarship in the United States, 1876-1901: As Revealed in the Correspondence of Herbert B. Adams

1939 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 438
Author(s):  
A. T. Volwiler ◽  
W. Stull Holt
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-154
Author(s):  
Marlene L. Daut

This essay explores the genealogy of historian and anthropologist Michel-Rolph Trouillot’s writings as related to broader trends in historical scholarship. The author suggests that it was through Silencing the Past’s acceptance and ascendance within the very North Atlantic “guild” that Trouillot deconstructs in his historical writings that the ideas of nineteenth-century Haitian historians such as Baron de Vastey, Hérard Dumesle, Beaubrun Ardouin, and Thomas Madiou produced an immeasurable influence on the direction of historical scholarship across the world. The author argues that the influence of these nineteenth-century Haitian authors can be seen everywhere in social history, especially in the concept of history from below, even though most historians in Europe and the United States have never even heard the names of these other Haitian authors.


1968 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Robert W. Friedrichs ◽  
W. Stull Holt ◽  
Lawrence E. Gelfand ◽  
Robert A. Skotheim

1997 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. John

Two decades have passed since the publication of The Visible Hand, Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.'s, magisterial account of the rise of the modern business enterprise in the United States. Although Chandlers pathbreaking work has been widely hailed as a landmark in business history, only rarely has anyone considered systematically its influence on the large body of historical scholarship on related topics. This essay is intended to help fill this gap. It is divided into two sections. The first section reviews Chandlers argument, touches on the relationship of Chandlers oeuvre to his personal background, and locates The Visible Hand in the context of American historical writing. The second considers how three groups of historians have responded to Chandlers ideas. These groups consist of champions who creatively elaborated on Chandler's intellectual agenda; critics who probed anomalies between Chandler's argument and their own research; and skeptics who rejected Chandlers analysis outright.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document