State Supervision of Local Fiscal Officers in Virginia

1931 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1004-1008
Author(s):  
James E. Pate
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Market Value ◽  
The State ◽  
Personal Property ◽  
State Supervision ◽  
The People ◽  
State Tax ◽  
Fair Market ◽  
Fair Market Value

One of the achievements of the brilliant administration of Harry F. Byrd was the segregation of the sources of revenue. The governor was quite sincere and enthusiastic in his support of this principle, believing, it seemed, that it was the panacea for a great many of our tax troubles. His exuberant enthusiasm caused him to make an error, many believe, when he had written into the rather inflexible constitution of the commonwealth the provision that no state tax shall be levied on real estate and tangible personal property. The state, therefore, no longer has any interest in this kind of property, and its supervision over local fiscal officers extends only so far as they are agents of the state, assessing and collecting the state's revenue.Each county and city has a local commissioner of the revenue, elected by the people, who assesses for the state intangible personal property, individual incomes, and money and capital, and who assesses for the local government tangible personal property, machinery and tools, and merchants' capital. The state tax commissioner has forms printed and sent to each local commissioner on which all the items mentioned above are supposed to be listed at their fair market value by the taxpayer. Mr. Morrissett, the present state tax commissioner, has inaugurated a plan of holding annual conventions of commissioners of the revenue where the problem of assessment and the complications of the state tax code are discussed.

The Impact of S Corporation Status on Fair Market Value

CFA Digest ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-90
Author(s):  
Frank T. Magiera
Keyword(s):  
Market Value ◽  
Fair Market ◽  
Fair Market Value ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Civil Engineering Inspection for Real Estate Evaluation with the Use of Artificial Learning Algorithms and Fuzzy Logic

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (338) ◽  
pp. 75-82
Author(s):  
Vladimir Surgelas ◽  
Irina Arhipova ◽  
Vivita Pukite
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Real Estate ◽  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Market Value ◽  
The State ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Real Estate ◽  
Technical Inspection ◽  
Physical Conditions

AbstractThe technical inspection of a building carried out by an expert in civil engineering can identify and classify the physical conditions of the real estate; this generates relevant information for the protection and safety of users. Given the real conditions of the property, and for the real estate valuation universe, using artificial intelligence and fuzzy logic, it is possible to obtain the market price associated with the physical conditions of the building. The objective of this experiment is to develop a property evaluation model using a civil engineering inspection form associated with artificial intelligence, and fuzzy logic, and also compare with market value to verify the applicability of this inspection form. Therefore, the methodology used is based on technical inspection of civil engineering regarding the state of conservation of properties according to the model used in Portugal and adapted to the reality of Latvia. Artificial intelligence is applied after obtaining data from that report. From this, association rules are obtained, which are used in the diffuse logic to obtain the price of the apartment per square meter, and for comparison with the market value. For this purpose, 48 samples of residential apartments located in the city of Jelgava in Latvia are used, with an inspection carried out from October to December 2019. The main result is the 9% error metric, which demonstrates the possibility of applying the method proposed in this experiment. Thus, for each apartment sample consulted, it resulted in the state of conservation and a market value associated.

Initial Observations on Valuation and Valuation Terminology

2019 ◽  
pp. 99-113
Author(s):  
Nicolaes Tollenaar
Keyword(s):  
Cash Flow ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Option Value ◽  
Enterprise Value ◽  
Going Concern ◽  
Asset Value ◽  
Fair Market ◽  
High Level ◽  
Key Steps ◽  
Fair Market Value

This chapter looks at valuation. It explains that in a restructuring a paper valuation exercise is needed to establish who still is entitled to value and who is not. In a liquidation, where the business is sold to the highest bidder in the market through a proper sale process, a valuation exercise is not required. In liquidation, the value available for distribution is determined by the market. The chapter then offers a high-level outline of the key steps of the valuation exercise in the context of a restructuring. Terminology is defined, such as asset value, cash flow value, going concern value, goodwill, enterprise value, reorganization value, liquidation value, fair market value, and option value.

Introducing Evidence of Contamination and Offsetting Cost of Remediation in Determining Fair Market Value for Eminent Domain Awards: A Review of Interrelationship between Environmental and Acquisition Law

1996 ◽  
Vol 1527 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Leona D. Jochnowitz
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Remediation ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Eminent Domain ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Environmental Laws ◽  
Environmental Liability ◽  
Fair Market ◽  
Procedural Rights ◽  
Fair Market Value

The issue is whether evidence of contamination is admissible and remediation costs may be offset in determining fair market value in eminent domain proceedings. The answer will depend on an analysis of methods of valuation and local acquisition statutes; economic impact of environmental regulation; effectiveness of attempts to resolve issues of environmental liability in the context of eminent domain proceedings; preclusive or nonpreclusive effect of the determination of value on future liability for environmental remediation; and use of the property. To understand these issues, an acquiring agency should view an eminent domain proceeding from the clear vantage point of a potential defendant or plaintiff in an environmental case. How these questions can be decided consistently with both local acquisition law and the other bodies of state and federal environmental law is the subject of a variety of recent court decisions. The theme that arises from the cases is that it appears fair to discount the valuation of property if the owner's procedural rights are satisfied, including determinations as to liability and third-party actions. Nevertheless, once payment is discounted, it is critical that the transferee does not have to pay twice for the same remediation but should be liable under the environmental laws for new or newly discovered contamination. A partial indemnification may be appropriate. In addition, issues regarding just compensation may be raised when an acquiring agency not only values a compensation award at zero but also seeks compensation for remediation costs that exceed the value of the property. Alternatives should be explored for escrowing the remediation costs, inviting the owner to clean up the property now or indemnifying the owner to the extent of the discount against future liability. One solution will not fit all cases, but these and other alternatives will make owners and states more thoughtful when property is acquired and better able to plan for the uncertainties that can arise in environmental liability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document