Some Recent British White Papers

1943 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-319
Author(s):  
W. Hardy Wickwar

The Beveridge, Scott, and Uthwatt reports are all concerned with the widening framework of governmental action within which our free enterprise system operates. None of them is revolutionary. The Scott report has even been called reactionary. The Beveridge and Uthwatt reports are based on a generation of practical experience. In their attempt to infuse a few clear principles into future policy, these two great reports, in their different ways, point towards greater order and system, the smoothing away of anomalies, the filling in of gaps. Procedures which have served certain categories of people or certain localities, they attempt to make universally and equally available to all people or to all localities. They mark a decisive step in the passage from the fragmentariness that is inseparable from experiment to the universality that is characteristic of good government.Sir William Beveridge's plan for social security is nothing less than an attempt to abolish want by redistributing income. He assumes that society has somehow to pay the cost of privation in any case, and therefore might as well do so consciously and deliberately through the instrumentality of government.

Science ◽  
1964 ◽  
Vol 144 (3624) ◽  
pp. 1293-1293
Author(s):  
David B. Charlton

2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-24
Author(s):  
Herwig Verschueren

This article seeks to provide a clearer picture of the role of methods for funding social security benefits in EC Coordination Regulation 1408/71. In past literature and in the case law surrounding Regulation 1408/71, this role has seldom been mentioned. However, this is changing in light of increasing numbers of questions emerging at both the policy-making level and at the level of Court of Justice proceedings. The first part of this paper deals with the role of different methods of financing social security in determining the material scope of the coordination regulation and the question of whether the method of financing certain benefits has a bearing on this material scope. The second part deals with the existing link within the coordination context between paying or having paid contributions and entitlement to benefits. I discuss, inter alia, the extent to which benefit levels are determined by the same legislation as that which determines contribution levels. I examine the extent to which Member States collecting contributions are also responsible for bearing the cost of the corresponding benefits and the extent to which a person who is paying or has paid contributions is entitled to benefits corresponding to those contributions. In light of this examination of the facts as they stand, I endeavour to consider possible alternatives, including the desirability of having a more direct link within the coordination context between payment of contributions and entitlement to benefits.


2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 101-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank N. Caliendo ◽  
Aspen Gorry ◽  
Sita Slavov

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
J. Embury

The increased level of exploration in Australia and New Zealand has resulted in insurance underwriters taking a closer look at the region. A number of unfortunate onshore blowouts during 2003 and 2004 have focussed their examinations to determine whether these were symptomatic, regional problems or just one-off events. One of the tools being used to determine the level of exposure when insuring a well in Australia or New Zealand is the well risk review. The reviews typically involve an examination of a number of the drilling contractor’s key documents. This allows the reviewer to gain an understanding of the technical difficulty of the well, any environmental impact should an incident occur and the capabilities of all supervisor personnel and the match between the need to drill the well and the capability of the rig and the planning completed. It is the operator’s responsibility to comply with any recommendations that eventuate from the review and failure to do so may void the control of well insurance.Typically, the underwriters carry the cost of these reviews which have highlighted a possible issue with the competency of rig personnel as the industry grapples with the shortage of experienced people in an expanding market. To complicate the issue for the industry, many of the more experienced personnel are nearing retirement age and suitably experienced replacements are few and far between.The well risk review process should be seen as complementary to the State regulatory reviews and will, along with initiatives being undertaken by some participants in the industry, contribute to a safer industry with fewer incidents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document