Foucault's Challenge to Critical Theory

1986 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen K. White

Power, subjectivity, otherness, and modernity are concepts that contemporary political theorists increasingly find to be closely interwoven. In search of an adequate comprehension of the interrelationships among these concepts, I examine the work of Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas. I argue that Foucault, although he is provocatively insightful on a number of key points, ultimately provides a less satisfactory account than Habermas. The core problem is Foucault's inability to conceptualize juridical subjectivity, something which is necessary if he is going to connect his notion of aesthetic subjectivity with his endorsement of new social movements.

Dialogue ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tony Couture

My project is to assess recent objections directed at Jürgen Habermas by Nancy Fraser, Iris Young and Seyla Benhabib. This dispute is significant because it concerns the value of the Enlightenment style, detached criticism promoted by Habermas as compared to new proposals about dissent from a stance connected to social movements. I argue that these feminist criticisms of Habermas's critical theory are compelling and that they require substantial changes in Habermas's thinking.


Daímon ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155-170
Author(s):  
César Ortega Esquembre

El objetivo de este artículo es defender que la pragmática transcendental ofrece la fundamentación normativa de la teoría crítica como teoría de la acción comunicativa. Para ello se expondrá en primer lugar el problema de la normatividad en la Teoría Crítica de la sociedad. Tras describir la forma que adquiere esta teoría tras el giro lingüístico operado por Jürgen Habermas, se reconstruirán en tercer lugar los elementos fundamentales de la pragmática transcendental apeliana y habermasiana. En cuarto y último lugar se mostrará que este modelo constituye la fundamentación normativa de la nueva teoría crítica. The aim of this paper is to argue that transcendental pragmatics constitutes the normative foundation of critical theory, understood as theory of communicative action. To that end, the issue of normativity within Critical Theory discussions is first exposed. After describing the form this theory takes from the linguistic turn carried out by Jürgen Habermas, key elements of Karl Otto Apel´s and Jürgen Habermas´ transcendental pragmatics are thirdly reconstructed. Fourth paragraph shows that this model operates as the normative foundation of the new critical theory.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 664-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria Otoni Mesquita ◽  
Suely Ferreira Deslandes

O artigo aborda a temática da construção dos prontuários a partir de análise documental no sentido de entender as práticas dos profissionais de saúde que integram equipes de pré-natal de adolescentes em dois ambulatórios da rede pública de atenção básica de saúde estadual e municipal. Partindo da definição contemporânea de prontuário, que entende que, para além da missão de ser um instrumento jurídico de registro de propriedade do paciente, ele também atua como mediador da comunicação intraequipe de saúde e da comunicação dessa equipe com o usuário, fazemos um resgate histórico e crítico, baseado na análise de Michel Foucault sobre a origem do registro como tecnologia disciplinar que caracterizou o nascimento da instituição hospitalar e da clínica moderna. Identificamos que o aspecto comunicativo, segundo conceito do 'agir comunicativo' de Jürgen Habermas, vem sendo negligenciado pelas equipes pesquisadas, fruto de uma visão profissional focada no 'sigilo' e no individual em detrimento da construção de saberes coletivos.


1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 367
Author(s):  
William Outhwaite ◽  
J. M. Bernstein ◽  
Lorenzo C. Simpson

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Müller-Doohm

The label ‘Frankfurt School’ became popular in the ‘positivism dispute’ in the mid-1960s, but this article shows that it is wrong to describe Jürgen Habermas as representing a ‘second generation’ of exponents of critical theory. His communication theory of society is intended not as a transformation of, but as an alternative to, the older tradition of thought represented by Adorno and Horkheimer. The novel and innovative character of Habermas’s approach is demonstrated in relation to three thematic complexes: (1) the public sphere and language; (2) democracy and the constitutional state; and (3) system and lifeworld as categories for a theory of modernity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document