scholarly journals An Assessment of the Accuracy of a Regional Economic-Demographic Projection Model

Demography ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve H. Murdock ◽  
F. Larry Leistritz ◽  
Rita R. Hamm ◽  
Sean-Shong Hwang ◽  
Banoo Parpia
Keyword(s):  
Projection Model ◽  
Regional Economic ◽  
Demographic Projection

Sensitivity analysis in a multidimensional demographic projection model with a two‐sex algorithm*

1993 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Ekamper ◽  
Nico Keilman
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Projection Model ◽  
Demographic Projection

A demographic projection model to support conservation decision making for an endangered snake with limited monitoring data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Tucker ◽  
C. P. McGowan ◽  
E. S. Mulero Oliveras ◽  
N. F. Angeli ◽  
J. P. Zegarra
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
Projection Model ◽  
Demographic Projection

LIPRO 2.0: An Application of a Dynamic Demographic Projection Model to Household Structure in the Netherlands

Population ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1321
Author(s):  
S. P. ◽  
W. Van Imhoff ◽  
N. W. Keilman
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Household Structure ◽  
Projection Model ◽  
Demographic Projection

The exponential multidimensional demographic projection model

1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evert Van Imhoff
Keyword(s):  
Projection Model ◽  
Demographic Projection

Cognitive Components of Ingroup Projection

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maya Machunsky ◽  
Thorsten Meiser
Keyword(s):  
Mental Representation ◽  
Cognitive Representation ◽  
Social Categories ◽  
Projection Model ◽  
Minimal Group ◽  
Model Experiments ◽  
Superordinate Category ◽  
Cognitive Components ◽  
Per Se

This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.

A dual projection model of partisan attitude perceptions

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Keating ◽  
Leaf Van Boven ◽  
Charles Judd
Keyword(s):  
Projection Model ◽  
Dual Projection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document