Competing Compatibility Standards and Network Externalities in the PC Software Market

1995 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Gandal
Keyword(s):  
Network Externalities ◽  
Software Market ◽  
Compatibility Standards

Chaotic dynamics in the software market with network externalities

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-519
Author(s):  
Haiyang Feng ◽  
Minqiang Li ◽  
Fuzan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Chaotic Dynamics ◽  
Network Externalities ◽  
Software Market

Screening with Network Externalities

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanqi Shi ◽  
Yiqing Xing
Keyword(s):  
Network Externalities

Agent Mediated Code Comprehension: A Cognitive Challenge

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ram Gopal Gupta ◽  
Bireshwar Dass Mazumdar ◽  
Kuldeep Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Software Design ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Software Agents ◽  
Cognitive Model ◽  
Cognitive Models ◽  
Software Market ◽  
Computing Paradigm ◽  
Cognitive Challenge ◽  
Software Code

The rapidly changing needs and opportunities of today’s global software market require unprecedented levels of code comprehension to integrate diverse information systems to share knowledge and collaborate among organizations. The combination of code comprehension with software agents not only provides a promising computing paradigm for efficient agent mediated code comprehension service for selection and integration of inter-organizational business processes but this combination also raises certain cognitive issues that need to be addressed. We will review some of the key cognitive models and theories of code comprehension that have emerged in software code comprehension. This paper will propose a cognitive model which will bring forth cognitive challenges, if handled properly by the organization would help in leveraging software design and dependencies.

Why Not Allow FASB and IASB Standards to Compete in the U.S.?

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald A. Dye ◽  
Shyam Sunder
Keyword(s):  
Network Externalities ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Standard Setting ◽  
Regulatory Competition ◽  
Regulatory Body ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Status ◽  
Informative Signals ◽  
The U.S

This paper discusses arguments for and against introducing competition into the accounting standard-setting process in the U.S. by allowing individual corporations to issue financial reports prepared in accordance with either FASB or IASB rules. The paper examines several arguments supporting the status quo, including (1) the FASB's experience and world leadership in making accounting rules; (2) the increased risk of a “race to the bottom” under regulatory competition; (3) the inability of most users of financial reports to understand the complex technical issues underlying accounting standards; (4) the possibility that IASB's standards will be diluted to gain international acceptance, allowing additional opportunities for earnings management; (5) the risks of the IASB being deadlocked or captured by interests hostile to business; (6) the costs of experimentation in standard setting; and (7) economies from network externalities. Arguments examined on the other side include how competition will (1) help meet the needs of globalized businesses; (2) increase the likelihood that the accounting standards will be efficient; (3) help protect standard setters from undue pressure from interest groups; (4) allow different standards to develop for different corporate clienteles; (5) allow corporations to send more informative signals by their choice of accounting standards; (6) protect corporations against capture of regulatory body by narrow interests; and (7) not affect network externalities at national or global scales.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document