Using Pooled Time-Series and Cross-Section Data to Test the Firm and Time Effects in Financial Analyses

1977 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-shyong Chang ◽  
Cheng F. Lee
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Cebula ◽  
Fabrizio Rossi ◽  
Jeff Clark

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether two specific forms of government policy influence entrepreneurship and hence the performance economy as a whole. Performance is measured in terms of living standards and growth therein. The policies are, as follows: higher quality government regulation of businesses and higher levels of economic freedom. Design/methodology/approach – The paper first provides a basic model focussing upon the regulation and economic freedom variables. The study then adds a dummy variable for G8 nations, a tax burden variable, and the long-term interest rate and provides six estimates. The empirical analysis involves pooled time-series/cross-section data for the OECD over the period 2003-2007. Findings – The findings indicate that for OECD nations, higher quality public regulation promotes entrepreneurial spirit and performance. Higher economic freedom does the same. The findings are that higher quality government regulation of business and higher levels of economic freedom lead to higher growth rates in the standard of living. Originality/value – The time period studied, i.e., just prior to the Great Recession, the context of the OECD, the adoption of pooled time-series/cross-section data, and the specific choice of variables in the analysis, along with the estimation of possibly unique or close to unique specifications involving the growth rate of living standards per se make this study different.


Econometrica ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 552
Author(s):  
V. K. Chetty

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Beck

Carter and Signorino (2010) (hereinafter “CS”) add another arrow, a simple cubic polynomial in time, to the quiver of the binary time series—cross-section data analyst; it is always good to have more arrows in one's quiver. Since comments are meant to be brief, I will discuss here only two important issues where I disagree: are cubic duration polynomials the best way to model duration dependence and whether we can substantively interpret duration dependence.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-187
Author(s):  
Leni Anjarwati ◽  
Whinarko Juliprijanto

This study aims to determine the factors that influence educated unemployment in Java. The data used in this study is secondary data using quantitative methods. Data analysis uses panel data analysis which is a combination of time series and cross-section data. The time-series data uses data for the 2015-2019 period and cross-section data from 6 provinces on the island of Java. The results showed that simultaneously all variables had a significant effect on the level of educated unemployment. While partially shows that the variable level of education and PMDN have a significant positive impact on educated unemployment, and the UMR variable has a significant negative impact on educated unemployment.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Beck ◽  
Jonathan N. Katz

This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series—cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document