No Evidence for Effects of Breeding Density and Male Removal on Extrapair Paternity in the Pied Flycatcher

The Auk ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-155
Author(s):  
Arne Lundberg ◽  
Rauno V. Alatalo
The Auk ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Osmo Rätti ◽  
Arne Lundberg ◽  
Håkan Tegelström ◽  
Rauno V. Alatalo

Abstract Molecular methods have brought new insight to the study of mating patterns. Extrapair fertilizations (EPF) have proven to be widespread among bird species irrespective of social relationships. Ecological factors, such as breeding density and synchrony, have been suggested as contributors to variation in EPF rates. Absence of a male during the female fertile period may also increase the probability of EPFs. In this study, we examined experimentally whether breeding density and male absence before egg-laying influence the EPF rate in Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). DNA fingerprinting revealed that 4.4% (10/225) of nestlings were the result of EPFs and 7.0% (3/43) of broods included at least one offspring sired by a male other than that attending the nest. We did not find any evidence of higher EPF rate with higher breeding density as stated by the density hypothesis. Contrary to expectation, EPFs were more frequent, though not quite statistically significantly, at low breeding density: all three EPF nests were found in low-breeding-density areas. There was no evidence that EPF rate was affected by a 4 h male removal. In all cases of EPF, an old female was mated with a yearling male, which suggests that older females mated with browner yearling males may have adjusted their initial mate choice through EPCs to acquire indirect genetic benefits. Pied Flycatcher females may be constrained to accept a mate of lower than preferred quality, especially at low breeding density, due to the cost of searching for alternative males.


1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter O. Dunn ◽  
Linda A. Whittingham ◽  
Jan T. Lifjeld ◽  
Raleigh J. Robertson ◽  
Peter T. Boag

Oecologia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 703-710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus P. Ahola ◽  
Toni Laaksonen ◽  
Tapio Eeva ◽  
Esa Lehikoinen

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e6059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir G. Grinkov ◽  
Andreas Bauer ◽  
Sergey I. Gashkov ◽  
Helmut Sternberg ◽  
Michael Wink

We explored the genetic background of social interactions in two breeding metapopulations of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Western Siberia. In 2005, we sampled blood from birds breeding in study areas located in the city of Tomsk and in a natural forest 13 km southward of Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia). We sampled 30 males, 46 females, 268 nestlings (46 nests) in the urban settlement of pied flycatcher, and 232 males, 250 females, 1,485 nestlings (250 nests) in the woodland plot. DNA fingerprinting was carried out using eight microsatellite loci, which were amplified by two multiplex-PCRs and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. About 50–58% of all couples were socially and genetically monogamous in both study plots. However, almost all possible social and genetic interactions were detected for non-monogamous couples: polygamy, polyandry, helping, adoption, and egg dumping. Differences in the rate of polygyny and the rate of extra-pair paternity between both study sites could be explained by differences in environmental heterogeneity and breeding density. Our findings suggest that egg dumping, adoption, polygamy, extra pair copulation, and other types of social-genetic interactions are modifications of the monogamous social system caused by patchy environment, breeding density, and birds’ breeding status.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Taylor ◽  
David Christie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document