scholarly journals Pharmacological study of formalin-induced inflammatory pain response.

1985 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 890-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Shibata
Author(s):  
Irina P Butkevich ◽  
Viktor A Mikhailenko ◽  
Elena A Vershinina

Abstract: Previously, we have shown that the administration of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine or a 5-HT1A receptor agonist buspirone to stressed rats during gestation causes in the offspring alleviation of formalin-induced pain, strengthened by prenatal stress. We have also found that neonatal inflammatory pain strengthens formalin-induced pain in prenatally unstressed rats in later life. In the present study we investigated the effect of neonatal inflammatory pain on the time-course of the biphasic pain response in the formalin test in prenatally stressed adolescent rats of both sexes to evaluate whether neonatal pain affects the antinociceptive properties of these drugs administered to their depressed mothers during gestation. Our findings demonstrate that neonatal pain modulates in prenatally stressed rats the antinociceptive effect of fluoxetine and buspirone depending on the level of organization of pain response in the CNS, the phase of the time-course of the formalin-induced pain, and sex.


Life Sciences ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 91 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 618-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor K.L. Hung ◽  
Samantha M.Y. Chen ◽  
Lydia W. Tai ◽  
Ann Y.S. Chen ◽  
Sookja K. Chung ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 661-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Chi Lin ◽  
Hung-Tsung Hsiao ◽  
Sheng-Nan Wu ◽  
Yen-Chin Liu

2009 ◽  
Vol 1286 ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina P. Butkevich ◽  
Victor A. Mikhailenko ◽  
Elena A. Vershinina ◽  
Pavel O. Semionov ◽  
Vladimir A. Otellin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. e27-e28
Author(s):  
D.M. Hodgson ◽  
E.J. Campbell ◽  
I. Zouikr ◽  
S.M. Watters ◽  
M.H. James ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu SHIBATA ◽  
Tsuyako OHKUBO ◽  
Hiroshi TAKAHASHI ◽  
Teruo KUDO ◽  
Reizo INOKI

Author(s):  
A. E. Sowers ◽  
E. L. Thurston

Plant stinging emergences exhibit functional similarities in that they all elicit a pain response upon contact. A stinging emergence consists of an elongated stinging cell and a multicellular pedestal (Fig. 1). A recent ultrastructural investigation of these structures has revealed the ontogeny and morphology of the stinging cells differs in representative genera in the four plant families which possess such structures. A unique feature of the stinging cell of Urtica dioica is the presence of a siliceous cell wall in the apical portion of the cell. This rigid region of the cell wall is responsible for producing the needle-like apparatus which penetrates the skin. The stinging cell differentiates the apical bulbous tip early in development and the cell continues growth by intercalary addition of non-silicified wall material until maturity.The uppermost region of the stinging cell wall is entirely composed of silica (Fig. 2, 3) and upon etching with a 3% solution of HF (5 seconds), the silica is partially removed revealing the wall consisting of individualized silica bodies (Fig. 4, 5).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document