scholarly journals Dimensional stability of alginate impression materials measured by a non-pressure direct method.

1986 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyoshi HABU ◽  
Naoki TANABE ◽  
Hirobumi UCHIDA
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dheeraj Kumar ◽  
Anand U Madihalli ◽  
K Rajeev Kumar Reddy ◽  
Namrataa Rastogi ◽  
NT Pradeep

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of the present study is to compare the various elastomeric impression materials in terms of accuracy and dimensional stability, with respect to obtaining multiple casts from a single elastomeric impression at various times of pours. Materials and methods Three master dies were prepared for the impression making, two of these were made of brass containing a central hole with undercuts. The third die simulated a conventionally prepared typodont maxillary central incisor. Three elastomeric impression materials were chosen for the study. Each impression was poured at various time periods. Casts thus obtained were evaluated under a traveling microscope to evaluate various dimensional changes. Results Addition silicones provided dies which were shorter in height and bigger in diameter. Polyethers provided dies which were shorter in both height and diameter. Condensation silicones showed insignificant changes from the master die at the immediate pour but deteriorated rapidly after that in subsequent pours. Conclusion None of the impression material showed a consistent behavior up to the fourth pour. They occasionally showed deviation from the pattern, but all these values were statistically insignificant. Polyethers showed lesser ability than both the addition silicones as well as the condensation silicones to recover from induced deformation. Clinical significance Addition silicones as well as the condensation silicones have better ability to recover from induced deformation when compared to polyether. How to cite this article Kumar D, Madihalli AU, Reddy KRK, Rastogi N, Pradeep NT. Elastomeric Impression Materials: A Comparison of Accuracy of Multiple Pours. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(4):272-278.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 621-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gelson Luís Adabo ◽  
Elaine Zanarotti ◽  
Renata Garcia Fonseca ◽  
Carlos Alberto dos Santos Cruz

1981 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 395-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Mincham. B.D.S.(Hons). B.Sc.(Hons) ◽  
S. M. Thurgate ◽  
A J. Lewis. B.Sc

PRILOZI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borjan Naumovski ◽  
Biljana Kapushevska

Abstract A quality-made dental impression is a prerequisite for successful fixed-prosthodontic fabrication and is directly dependent on the dimensional stability, accuracy and flexibility of the elastomeric impression materials, as well as on the appropriately used impression techniques. The purpose of this paper is to provide a literature review of relevant scientific papers which discuss the use of various silicone impression materials, different impression techniques and to evaluate their impact on the dimensional stability and accuracy of the obtained impressions. Scientific papers and studies were selected according to the materials used, the sample size, impression technique, storage time, type of measurements and use of spacer for the period between 2002 and 2016. In the reviewed literature several factors that influence the dimensional stability and accuracy of silicone impression molds, including the choice of the type of viscosity, impression material thickness, impression technique, retention of the impression material on the tray, storage time before the casting, number of castings, hydrophilicity of the material, release of byproducts, contraction after polymerization, thermal contraction and incomplete elastic recovery were presented. The literature review confirmed the lack of standardization of methodologies applied in the research and their great diversity. All findings point to the superiority of the addition silicone compared to the condensation silicone.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 626-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Corso ◽  
Abdulhadi Abanomy ◽  
James Di Canzio ◽  
David Zurakowski ◽  
Steven M. Morgano

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document