scholarly journals Long-term follow-up of use of therapy services for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

2020 ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
N Andelic ◽  
M Forslund ◽  
P Perrin ◽  
S Sigurdardottir ◽  
J Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Therapy Services

scholarly journals The pattern of hospital-community-home (HCH) nursing in tracheostomy patients with severe traumatic brain injury: is it feasible?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyi Yin ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Lihui Zhou ◽  
Chunyan Ni ◽  
Minyan Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Barthel Index ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Severe Tbi

Abstract Background: Tracheostomy is very common in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and long-term nursing care are needed for those patients. We aimed to evaluate the effects of hospital-community-home (HCH) nursing in those patients. Methods: Tracheostomy patients with severe TBI needing long-term care were included. All patients underwent two months long follow-up. Glasgow coma score (GCS), Karnofsky, Self-Anxiety Scale (SAS) (SAS) and Barthel assessment at the discharge and two months after discharge were evaluated. The tracheostomy related complications were recorded and compared.Results: A total of 60 patients were included. There weren’t significant differences between two groups in the GCS, Karnofsky, SAS and Barthel index at discharge((all p>0.05), the GCS, Karnofsky and Barthel index was all significantly increased after two months follow-up for two groups (all p<0.05), and the GCS, Karnofsky and Barthel index at two months follow-up in HCH group was significantly higher than that of control group(all p<0.05), but the SAS at two months follow-up in HCH group was significantly less than that of control group(p=0.009). The incidence of block of artificial tracheal cannula and readmission in HCH group were significant less than that of control group (all p<0.05).Conclusion: HCH nursing care is feasible in tracheostomy patients with severe TBI, future studies are needed to further evaluate the role of HCH nursing care.

Evaluation and Management of Frontal Sinus Fractures

Neurotrauma ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 143-154
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Peitz ◽  
Mark A. Miller ◽  
Gregory W. J. Hawryluk ◽  
Ramesh Grandhi
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Intracranial Extension ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Initial Injury ◽  
Management Algorithms

Frontal sinus fractures are usually associated with traumatic brain injury and nasoorbitoethmoidal fractures. Much of the available evidence is retrospective, and management algorithms vary. In general, nondisplaced fractures without nasofrontal outflow tract (NFOT) obstruction may be managed with clinical and radiographic follow-up whereas fracture displacement, NFOT obstruction, and persistent CSF leaks are indications for operative management. The bicoronal incision and bifrontal craniotomy allow for proper access to the frontal sinus. If there is NFOT obstruction, the sinus should be cranialized or possibly obliterated if only the anterior table is fractured. The NFOT and sinus are packed with bone chips, fat, or muscle and then sealed with a pericardial graft, fascial graft, or synthetic dural substitute. Inadequate cranialization or obliteration can result in mucocele or mucopyocele, intracranial extension of which can lead to brain abscess or meningitis. Complications can occur years after the initial injury so long-term follow-up is necessary.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document