SEM Evaluation of a Non-rinse Conditioner and a Self-etching Adhesive Regarding Enamel Penetration

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Miranda ◽  
J. O. A. P. Cal Neto ◽  
M. O. Barceleiro ◽  
K. R. H. C. Dias

Clinical Relevance Although the use of self-etching systems has resulted in regular etch patterns, they have provided less demineralization, preserving enamel surfaces.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 648-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. F. Burrow ◽  
D. Banomyong ◽  
C. Harnirattisai ◽  
H. H. Messer

Clinical Relevance Glass-ionomer lining showed no benefit in reducing postoperative sensitivity associated with occlusal resin composite restorations. The use of self-etching adhesive demonstrated postoperative sensitivity similar to that of total-etching adhesive.



1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Carrie Bain ◽  
Nan Bernstein Ratner

Due to the large volume of fluency-related publications since the last column, we have chosen to highlight those articles of highest potential clinical relevance.



2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 86-86
Author(s):  
Roland Bonfig ◽  
Hubertus Riedmiller ◽  
Burkhardt Kneitz ◽  
Philipp Stroebel


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Dieter R. Echtle ◽  
Elizabeth M. Mueller ◽  
Detlef H. Frohneberg




1984 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 521-521
Author(s):  
Allen E. Bergin
Keyword(s):  


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey A. Mcgregor ◽  
Robin S. Edelstein ◽  
Emily L. Kean


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document