A Study of Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations Using Four Different Curing Techniques

10.2341/06-98 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Gharizadeh ◽  
K. Moradi ◽  
M. H. Haghighizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance For bonded direct Class II restorations, the use of transparent matrices or metal matrices combined with light conducting instruments, such as light tips, should be favored because marginal leakage is significantly lower when compared to using metal matrices alone.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proximal Contacts of Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. C. Loomans ◽  
N. J. M. Opdam ◽  
F. J. M. Roeters ◽  
E. M. Bronkhorst ◽  
R. C. W. Burgersdijk
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance When placing a Class II resin composite restoration, the use of sectional matrix systems and separation rings to obtain tight proximal contacts is recommended.

Gingival Microleakage of Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts

10.2341/06-86 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
W. El-Badrawy ◽  
A. Eltanty ◽  
K. Abbasi ◽  
N. Habib
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Fiber Inserts

Clinical Relevance Fiber inserts incorporated at the gingival floor of Class II composite restorations resulted in a significant reduction of microleakage scores as compared to restorations made without inserts. This may lead to a reduced incidence of recurrent caries.

Factors Associated with Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-16 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Idriss ◽  
T. Abduljabbar ◽  
C. Habib ◽  
R. Omar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Gap Size ◽  
Marginal Gap ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Placement Technique

Clinical Relevance Even though marginal gap size was not shown to be a direct predictor for the extent of microleakage in resin composite restorations, both material and placement technique appear to be important determinants in microleakage and, thus, probably in clinical outcomes.

The Influence of Matrix Type on the Proximal Contact in Class II Resin Composite Restorations

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kampouropoulos ◽  
C. Paximada ◽  
M. Loukidis ◽  
A. Kakaboura
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Matrix Type ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The types of matrices assessed, metal or transparent, circumferential or sectional, straight or pre-contoured, were not able to adequately reconstruct all the characteristics of the proximal contact area of an intact tooth in Class II resin composite restorations.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Proximal Contact Tightness of Class II Resin Composite Restorations

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Saber ◽  
A. C. Loomans ◽  
A. El Zohairy ◽  
C. E. Dörfer ◽  
W. El-Badrawy
Keyword(s):  
Contact Area ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance The use of sectional matrix bands combined with a separation ring and wedge is recommended to reconstruct the proximal contact area of Class II resin composite restorations

Influence of Curing Methods and Matrix Type on the Marginal Seal of Class II Resin-based Composite Restorations In Vitro

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Hofmann ◽  
A. Hunecke
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Matrix Type ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Soft Start ◽  
Curing Methods ◽  
Photo Curing ◽  
Selection Of

Clinical Relevance Selection of photo-curing protocol (high intensity vs soft-start) and matrix type (transparent vs metal) did not influence the margin quality and marginal seal of Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Class II Composite Restorations: Importance of Cervical Enamel In Vitro

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Laegreid ◽  
NR Gjerdet ◽  
PV von Steyern ◽  
A-K Johansson
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance The presence of enamel at the cervical margin of a class II preparation increases the fracture strength of the composite restoration at the marginal ridge, but fractures are more complicated when they occur.

The Effect of Flowable Materials on the Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations That Extend Apical to the Cemento-enamel Junction

10.2341/08-91 ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sadeghi ◽  
C. D. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Composite Restoration

Clinical Relevance The use of a flowable resin composite or compomer may reduce microleakage at the gingival floor of a deep Class II composite restoration that extends apical to the cemento-enamel junction.

Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations Lined with Self-adhesive Resin Cements

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Al-Saleh ◽  
O. El-Mowafy ◽  
L. Tam ◽  
A. Fenton
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Composite Restorations

Clinical Relevance Two self-adhesive resin cements resulted in minimal microleakage scores when used as liners in Class II composite restorations.

Influence of Beveling and Ultrasound Application on Marginal Adaptation of Box-only Class II (slot) Resin Composite Restorations

10.2341/06-84 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Schmidlin ◽  
K. Wolleb ◽  
T. Imfeld ◽  
M. Gygax ◽  
A. Lussi
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Ultrasound Application

Clinical Relevance Beveling box-only Class II cavities is necessary to improve the marginal quality of restorations. Where beveling is impossible or difficult to achieve, ultrasound may improve marginal quality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document