Oral flurbiprofen spray for postoperative sore throat and hoarseness: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Togay Muderris ◽  
Gunay Tezcan ◽  
Mecit Sancak ◽  
Fatih Gul ◽  
Gokcer Ugur
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujita Manandhar ◽  
Kishor Manandhar ◽  
Sharad Khakrel

Introductions: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a commonly seen adverse event after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Dexamethasone, a potent corticosteroid with anti-inflammatory action is the most popular steroid studied in this regard with positive results. Methods: This randomized, prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted on one hundred and ten adult patients of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I & II, undergoing elective surgeries requiring endotracheal tube intubation. After obtaining written informed consent, they were randomly divided into Control (A, n=55) and Dexamethasone (B, n=55) groups and received either an injection of Dexamethasone (Group B) 8 mg intravenously or an equivalent volume of Normal Saline (Group A) just before entering the operating theatre. All the patients received a similar anesthesia with endotracheal tube intubation and at the end of surgery, extubated and transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit. The incidence and severity of sore throat were assessed at 1, 6 and 24 hours post-extubation. Severity of sore throat were graded on a 4 point scale, p <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Incidence of POST in Dexamethasone group was found significantly low compared to the control group up to six hours (p<0.05) but was comparable at 24 hours post extubation. Severity of POST in the study group was of lower grade in compare to control group. Conclusions: Prophylactic intravenous Dexamethasone 8 mg administered to patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring endotracheal tube intubation significantly reduces the incidence and severity of POST up to six hours post-extubation.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard P Schachtel ◽  
Adrian Shephard ◽  
Timothy Shea ◽  
Kathleen Sanner ◽  
Laurie Savino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-11
Author(s):  
Dhiman Neogi ◽  
Sudeshna Bhar Kundu ◽  
Chaitali Biswas ◽  
Anisha Ghosh ◽  
Sourav Das

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication following general anaesthesia (GA) with orotracheal intubation. Both magnesium sulphate nebulisation and lignocaine nebulisation have been reported to be used successfully to reduce the incidence and severity of POST. Till date, no study has been reported comparing the efcacy of these two drugs for attenuation of POST. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the efcacy of preoperative lignocaine nebulisation and magnesium sulphate nebulisation in reducing the incidence and severity of POSTin patients undergoing GAwith orotracheal intubation. METHODS:Aprospective, double blind, parallel group, randomised, controlled study was conducted on 96 patients, aged between 18-50 years, ASAphysical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under GAwith orotracheal intubation. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups, group L and group M. The patients in group L (n=48) received 4% lignocaine nebulisation (3 ml) and those in group M (n=48) received isotonic magnesium sulphate nebulisation (3 ml) over 15 minutes ending 5 minutes prior to induction of GA. The patients were assessed for incidence and severity of POST, cough, hoarseness of voice and dysphagia at 5 minutes and thereafter at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 hours in the postoperative period. All data were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: POST four-point scale was found to be signicantly lower in group M in comparison to group L at 5 minutes and 1 hour in the postoperative period. Hoarseness severity score and dysphagia severity score were also signicantly lower in group M at 1 hour postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In comparison to lignocaine nebulisation; magnesium sulphate nebulisation was found to be more effective to reduce the incidence and severity of POST, hoarseness of voice, and dysphagia particularly in the early postoperative period.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Sousa ◽  
Deepak R. Lakha ◽  
Sandrine Brette ◽  
Simon Hitier

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new hard-boiled lozenge formulation containing ambroxol 20 mg versus placebo for the relief of sore throat in patients with acute pharyngitis. Methods This was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter trial conducted between June and September 2018 in South Africa. Patients with a diagnosis of acute pharyngitis, onset ≤ 72 h, and sore throat pain of at least moderate intensity were randomized to receive either ambroxol 20 mg or placebo hard-boiled lozenges. The primary efficacy endpoint was the normalized time-weighted sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) from baseline over 3 h following administration of the first lozenge (SPIDnorm,0–3h). Secondary efficacy endpoints included SPID 24 h after the first lozenge intake (SPIDnorm,0–24h) and patient assessment of efficacy at 3 and 24 h after the first lozenge. Results Of 422 patients from 11 centers, 390 were randomized to one of the two treatment groups (n = 196, ambroxol; n = 194, placebo) and 388 were analyzed (modified intention-to-treat). The mean ± standard deviation SPIDnorm,0–3h values were −0.386 (0.259) and −0.366 (0.243) in the ambroxol and placebo groups, respectively, and the adjusted mean ± standard error SPIDnorm0–3h difference between ambroxol and placebo was −0.020 (0.025) (p = 0.443). Comparable results between treatment groups were also found for SPIDnorm,0–24h and patient assessment of efficacy at 3 and 24 h after the first lozenge. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar between treatment groups (11.7% for ambroxol versus 9.3% for placebo). Conclusion Although marked pain relief was observed over the first 3 h of treatment, superiority of ambroxol 20 mg hard-boiled lozenges versus placebo was not demonstrated in this study. Trial Registration NCT03583658. Funding Sanofi-Aventis Group.


Author(s):  
Chan Jong Chung ◽  
Seong Yeop Jeong ◽  
Joon Ho Jeong ◽  
Sung Wan Kim ◽  
Kyung Hyun Lee ◽  
...  

Background: Sore throat and hoarseness frequently occur following general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and are effectively reduced when dexamethasone is used prophylactically. Alchemilla vulgaris in glycerine (Neo Mucosal Activator®) suppresses inflammatory response, possibly relieving sore throat.Methods: We enrolled 94 patients (age ≥ 18 years) scheduled for thoracic surgery using double-lumen tube intubation. Before intubation, 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone was administered intravenously and 2 ml of normal saline was sprayed into the oropharyngeal cavity (Group D; n = 45), or 0.04 ml/kg normal saline was administered intravenously and 1 g of Neo Mucosal Activator® mixed with 1 ml of normal saline was sprayed into the oropharyngeal cavity (Group N; n = 43), in a double blind and prospectively randomized manner. Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness were recorded using a numeral rating scale and a 4-point scale to detect a change in voice quality following tracheal extubation (at 1, 6, and 24 h). The primary outcome was the incidence of sore throat at 24 h following surgery. The secondary outcomes were incidence and severity of sore throat and hoarseness.Results: There were no significant differences in the incidence of sore throat at 24 h following surgery (57.8% vs. 46.5%; P = 0.290) or in the incidence and intensity of sore throat and hoarseness at 1, 6, and 24 h following surgery between the groups. Conclusions: A. vulgaris in glycerine did not significantly differ from dexamethasone for preventing sore throat and hoarseness owing to intubation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document