Effects of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block combined with laryngeal mask sevoflurane general anesthesia on inflammation and stress response in children undergoing upper limb fracture surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi GAO ◽  
Pengqi DAI ◽  
Lei SHI ◽  
Wenjing CHEN ◽  
Wenjuan BAO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Response ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Laryngeal Mask ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Upper Limb Fracture ◽  
Plexus Block ◽  
Fracture Surgery

scholarly journals Ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block via lower approach for upper limb surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1304
Author(s):  
Roopal R. Garaniya ◽  
Sheetal Shah ◽  
Noopur Prajapati
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Ulnar Nerve ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Interscalene Block ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Stimulator ◽  
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Brachial plexus block via interscalene approach is an excellent option for upper limb surgeries, but due to sparing of ulnar nerve (lower trunk, C8-T1) and its’ complications, it is not so popular. To overcome this problem, interscalene block via lower approach has been tried which has more advantage in view of ulnar nerve blockage and also less complications. In addition, ultrasound provides reliability, ease, rapidity and also patient comfort during block procedure. This prospective study was performed to evaluate the anaesthetic effect of lower approach interscalene block with the help of ultrasound and peripheral nerve stimulator.Methods: Ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block via lower approach was given in randomly selected 30 patients, undergoing upper limb orthopaedic surgeries. After localisation of brachial plexus with ultrasound, the nerve roots were confirmed with the help of peripheral nerve stimulator, before injecting drug. At 5 and 15 min after block, all patients were assessed for the effect. Postoperatively they were assessed for any complication and also for their satisfaction level by Likert’s scale.Results: In territories of ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous nerve there was 100% effect while in median nerve territory 92.8% motor block was there. There was no need of analgesics during intra operative period in any patient and there were no major complications with this approach.Conclusions: Ultrasound guided interscalene block via lower approach is an excellent alternative for upper limb surgeries over classical approach in view of ulnar nerve blockage without any major complication.

scholarly journals Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine as adjuvant to bupivacaine 0.25% in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 4512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Usha K. Chaudhary ◽  
Amruth Danesh ◽  
Monika Mahajan ◽  
Sudarshan Kumar ◽  
Versha Verma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Ultrasound guided brachial plexus block is the preferred technique for surgeries on upper limb. Adjuvants are usually added to peripheral nerve blocks to increase their analgesic efficiency and duration. We compared analgesic effects of dexmedetomidine 1mcg/kg and clonidine 1mcg/kg as adjuvant to a low volume of bupivacaine in USG guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled, double blind study planned after permission from institutional ethics committee. Sixty ASA grade I, II patients, 18-60 years undergoing upper limb orthopedic surgery included. Group 1 (Control group) received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group 2 (Dexmedetomidine group) received 20ml of bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine (10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1µg/kg of dexmedetomidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml) Group 3 (Clonidine group) received 20 ml of 0.25 bupivacaine + clonidine (10ml of 0.5% bupivacaine+1µ g/kg of clonidine, diluted with 0.9% NS to 20 ml) in USG guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Continuous variables analyzed with analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test and categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test.Results: Pain free period was 864.90±357.16 minutes: dexmedetomidine group; 584.59±172.38 minutes: clonidine group, 431.78±138.40 minutes: control group with p< 0.001. VRS (verbal rating score) was significantly higher in control group as compared to dexmedetomidine at 4 hours but the pain scores were comparable between all the groups after 8 hours of block.Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine provides prolonged anaesthesia, better pain relief in early postoperative period with haemodynamically stable, calm patients compared to clonidine and control group.

scholarly journals A comparative study of intravenous versus perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.75% ropivacaine by ultrasound guided technique in upper limb surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 2407
Author(s):  
Fahad Khan ◽  
V. P. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Comparative study of intravenous versus perineural administration of dexmedetomidine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.75% ropivacaine by ultrasound guided technique in upper limb surgeries.Methods: Patients in the age group 18-58 years both male and female, having ASA 1 and ASA 2, scheduled for elective surgery of unilateral upper limb surgeries were included and randomly divided into three groups’ i.e. group RD, group RDI and group R and patients with chronic pain or taking any analgesics, ASA grade III and IV, bleeding disorders, history of brachial plexus injury, known allergy to the study drug, previous shoulder surgery, any psychiatric disorders, peripheral neuropathy, failed block, significant respiratory disease, hearing impairment, pregnant women, study were excluded.Results: Time to sensory onset in group RD was as compared to group RDI and group R was found statistically significant (p<0.001). Duration of sensory block (analgesia) in group RD, group RDI and Group R was also statistically significant (p<0.001). The level of sedation of Group RDI and Group RD had highly significant value till 30 mins (p<0.001).Conclusions: The central effects of dexmedetomidine also play some role in prolongation of sensory and motor block duration, as explained previously.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document