Nudges for Rural Sanitation: Evaluating low-touch methods to promote latrine use in Rural Bihar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pulkit Agarwal ◽  
Karan Nagpal
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaon Lahiri ◽  
◽  
Rosaine N Yegbemey ◽  
Neeta Goel ◽  
Leja Mathew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Urban Studies ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 004209802091182
Author(s):  
YuJung Julia Lee ◽  
Tiffany Radcliff

While the current scholarship on open defecation overwhelmingly focuses on increasing access to sanitation facilities as the solution, millions of people around the world still practise open defecation despite having latrines. This is especially problematic in urban slums where people are more vulnerable to sanitation-related diseases compared with rural areas because of their high population density. We explore why latrines are not being used even when they are available to slum dwellers by identifying social interactions that serve as information channels that promote public latrine use. Using an original survey in New Delhi, we find that slum dwellers who frequently interact with slum leaders, more so than other community leaders, are more likely to use nearby public latrines regularly. A survey of slum leaders finds that their role in fixing and maintaining public latrines and informing others of these acts as well as educating people on hygiene encourage public latrine use.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
VARUN GAURI ◽  
TASMIA RAHMAN ◽  
IMAN K. SEN

Abstract Toilet ownership in India has grown in recent years, but open defecation can persist even when rural households own latrines. There are at least two pathways through which social norms inhibit the use of toilets in rural India: (1) beliefs/expectations that others do not use toilets or latrines or find open defecation unacceptable; and (2) beliefs about ritual notions of purity that dissociate latrines from cleanliness. A survey in Uttar Pradesh, India, finds a positive correlation between latrine use and social norms at baseline. To confront these, an information campaign was piloted to test the effectiveness of rebranding latrine use and promoting positive social norms. The intervention targeted mental models by rebranding latrine use and associating it with cleanliness, and it made information about growing latrine use among latrine owners more salient. Following the intervention, open defecation practices went down across all treatment households, with the average latrine use score in treatment villages increasing by up to 11% relative to baseline. Large improvements were also observed in pro-latrine beliefs. This suggests that low-cost information campaigns can effectively improve pro-latrine beliefs and practices, as well as shift perceptions of why many people still find open defecation acceptable. Measuring social norms as described can help diagnose barriers to reducing open defecation, contribute to the quality of large-scale surveys and make development interventions more sustainable.


2013 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 717-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meron Haile ◽  
Bruce D. Gaynor ◽  
Zerihun Tadesse ◽  
Sintayehu Gebreselassie ◽  
Sun N. Yu ◽  
...  

Mammal Study ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yayoi Kaneko ◽  
Takeyoshi Suzuki ◽  
Oichi Atoda

Behaviour ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 127 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 289-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J. Roper ◽  
L. Conradt ◽  
J. Butler ◽  
S.E. Christian ◽  
J. Ostler ◽  
...  

Abstract Badgers (Meles meles) defecate, urinate and scent mark at latrines which seem to have a territorial function. The main aim of the present study was to compare defecation patterns at boundary and hinterland latrines, in order to test the hypothesis that these two types of latrine have a similar function. We investigated latrine use by means of a year-round survey of all the latrines in 7 badger territories, by bait-marking of 15 territories, and by monitoring latrine use in 6 radio-collared badgers belonging to three social groups. The spatial distribution of latrines within a territory was bimodal, with the greatest densities oflatrines close to the outside, and close to the centre, of the territory respectively. Boundary latrines were larger and more consistently used than hinterland latrines, but these differences could be accounted for by the fact that boundary latrines are visited by the members of more than one social group. Defecation at latrines was subject to seasonal variation, with a major peak in latrine use in spring and a minor peak in autumn. The spring peak was largely attributable to an increase in the use of hinterland latrines, the autumn peak to an increase in the use of boundary latrines. Males visited boundary latrines considerably more often than did females, but both sexes visited hinterland latrines equally often. Overmarking occurred equally often at both types of latrine and involved animals from the same as well as from different groups, but there was a significant tendency for more between-group than within-group overmarking. Overmarking occurred mainly on fresh, as opposed to old, faeces deposits. The sex and seasonal differences in use of boundary latrines suggest that these function at least partly as a form of mate-guarding, to deter neighbouring males from entering a territory for mating purposes. It is less clear why females mark at hinterland latrines. One possibility, consistent with the observed spatial distribution of hinterland latrines, is that they function to defend the main burrow system, which is used for breeding; another is that they carry information about social status. Overmarking probably serves to obliterate the marks of competitors, which are members of neighbouring social groups in the case of boundary latrines, but may be members of the same social group in the case of hinterland latrines. We conclude that previous ideas about the function of territoriality in badgers, and about the information conveyed by latrines, are oversimplified.


Ecosphere ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. art19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youbing Zhou ◽  
Wenwen Chen ◽  
Christina D. Buesching ◽  
Chris Newman ◽  
Yayoi Kaneko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document