scholarly journals Identifying The Purchasing Power Parity of Indonesia Rupiah (IDR) based on BIG MAC Index

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Tongam Sihol Nababan
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Purchasing Power Parity ◽  
Real Income ◽  
Purchasing Power ◽  
Power Parity ◽  
The Real ◽  
The People ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Exchange Rate ◽  
Asean Countries

The aim of this study is to identify : (1) profile of exchange rate and purchasing power parity of IDR against US $ based on Big Mac Index compared to the exchange rate of other countries, and (2) the position of the Big Mac Affordability of  Indonesia compared to other ASEAN countries. The results showed that based on Big Mac index during the period April 1998 up to January 2015, IDR exchange rate tends to be undervalued against the USA dollar. The cause of the currency tends to be in a position of undervalued due to the components of non-tradable have not been included in Big Mac index. The index of Big Mac Affordability indicates that there is a great disparity of income between Singapore and five other ASEAN countries. The purchasing power of the real income of the people in Singapore is nearly five times the real income of the people in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Nonlinear Cointegration and Asymmetric Adjustment in Purchasing Power Parity of the USA, Germany, and Pakistan

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kashif Ali ◽  
Hafsa Hina ◽  
Muhammad Ijaz ◽  
Mahmoud El-Morshedy
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Purchasing Power Parity ◽  
Purchasing Power ◽  
Power Parity ◽  
Asymmetric Adjustment ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Nominal Exchange Rates ◽  
Trading Partners ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Exchange Rate

The current study explores nonlinear cointegration as well as asymmetric adjustment to investigate the long-run purchasing power parity in three major trading partners of Pakistan. The ESTAR and LSTAR models were used to investigate the behavior of the nominal exchange rates. The findings declared that series follows the nonlinear exchange rate. The asymmetric behavior of the exchange rate allows the threshold cointegration model to be implemented. In the case of Pakistan-China, the result suggests that long-run PPP holds. As a result, trading will be more profitable if the exchange rate is varied in relation to major trading partners rather than just the US dollar.

Purchasing power parity as a long-term memory process

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Bilel Triki ◽  
Samir Maktouf
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Purchasing Power Parity ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Purchasing Power ◽  
Power Parity ◽  
Fractional Cointegration ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Long Run ◽  
The Usa

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on whether the deviations from the cointegrating relationship possess long memory and the fractional cointegration analyses may capture a wider range of mean-reversion behaviour than standard cointegration analyses. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses a fractional cointegration technique to test the purchasing power parity (PPP). Findings – The authors found that PPP held, but very weakly, in the long run between the Argentine, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Korea, Mexico, Thailand and Venezuela and US exchange rate during our floating exchange rate period but that the deviations from it did not follow a stationary process. Nevertheless, it is also found that the deviations from PPP exists and can be characterized by a fractionally integrated process in nine out of 13 countries studied. Originality/value – The findings are consistent with the consensus of the empirical literature, reviewed earlier in this paper, on PPP between Argentine, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, Korea, Mexico, Thailand and Venezuela and the USA.

Purchasing Power Parity and Real Exchange Rates

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Menzie D. Chinn
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Exchange Rates ◽  
Real Exchange Rate ◽  
Purchasing Power Parity ◽  
Time Horizon ◽  
Nominal Exchange Rate ◽  
Purchasing Power ◽  
Power Parity ◽  
The Real ◽  
Short Run

The idea that prices and exchange rates adjust so as to equalize the common-currency price of identical bundles of goods—purchasing power parity (PPP)—is a topic of central importance in international finance. If PPP holds continuously, then nominal exchange rate changes do not influence trade flows. If PPP does not hold in the short run, but does in the long run, then monetary factors can affect the real exchange rate only temporarily. Substantial evidence has accumulated—with the advent of new statistical tests, alternative data sets, and longer spans of data—that purchasing power parity does not typically hold in the short run. One reason why PPP doesn’t hold in the short run might be due to sticky prices, in combination with other factors, such as trade barriers. The evidence is mixed for the longer run. Variations in the real exchange rate in the longer run can also be driven by shocks to demand, arising from changes in government spending, the terms of trade, as well as wealth and debt stocks. At time horizon of decades, trend movements in the real exchange rate—that is, systematically trending deviations in PPP—could be due to the presence of nontraded goods, combined with real factors such as differentials in productivity growth. The well-known positive association between the price level and income levels—also known as the “Penn Effect”—is consistent with this channel. Whether PPP holds then depends on the time period, the time horizon, and the currencies examined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document