Gain Variation of Phased-Arrays with Normally Distributed Pointing Errors

Author(s):  
Yao-Wen Hsu
1973 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Carver ◽  
W. Cooper ◽  
W. Stutzman

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. LIASKAS ◽  
G. STEPHANOU ◽  
D. MARTAKOS

Author(s):  
Michael K. Kundmann ◽  
Ondrej L. Krivanek

Parallel detection has greatly improved the elemental detection sensitivities attainable with EELS. An important element of this advance has been the development of differencing techniques which circumvent limitations imposed by the channel-to-channel gain variation of parallel detectors. The gain variation problem is particularly severe for detection of the subtle post-threshold structure comprising the EXELFS signal. Although correction techniques such as gain averaging or normalization can yield useful EXELFS signals, these are not ideal solutions. The former is a partial throwback to serial detection and the latter can only achieve partial correction because of detector cell inhomogeneities. We consider here the feasibility of using the difference method to efficiently and accurately measure the EXELFS signal.An important distinction between the edge-detection and EXELFS cases lies in the energy-space periodicities which comprise the two signals. Edge detection involves the near-edge structure and its well-defined, shortperiod (5-10 eV) oscillations. On the other hand, EXELFS has continuously changing long-period oscillations (∼10-100 eV).


Author(s):  
Maoxu Qian ◽  
Mehmet Sarikaya ◽  
Edward A. Stern

It is difficult, in general, to perform quantitative EELS to determine, for example, relative or absolute compositions of elements with relatively high atomic numbers (using, e.g., K edge energies from 500 eV to 2000 eV), to study ELNES (energy loss near edge structure) signal using the white lines to determine oxidation states, and to analyze EXELFS (extended energy loss fine structure) to study short range ordering. In all these cases, it is essential to have high signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio (low systematical error) with high overall counts, and sufficient energy resolution (∽ 1 eV), requirements which are, in general, difficult to attain. The reason is mainly due to three important inherent limitations in spectrum acquisition with EELS in the TEM. These are (i) large intrinsic background in EELS spectra, (ii) channel-to-channel gain variation (CCGV) in the parallel detection system, and (iii) difficulties in obtaining statistically high total counts (∽106) per channel (CH). Except the high background in the EELS spectrum, the last two limitations may be circumvented, and the S/N ratio may be attained by the improvement in the on-line acquisition procedures. This short report addresses such procedures.


Author(s):  
Karl F. Warnick ◽  
Rob Maaskant ◽  
Marianna V. Ivashina ◽  
David B. Davidson ◽  
Brian D. Jeffs

1968 ◽  
Vol 78 (2, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley M. DuCharme ◽  
Cameron R. Peterson
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 28 (03) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A Murphy ◽  
M. E Francis ◽  
J. F Mustard

SummaryThe characteristics of experimental error in measurement of platelet radioactivity have been explored by blind replicate determinations on specimens taken on several days on each of three Walker hounds.Analysis suggests that it is not unreasonable to suppose that error for each sample is normally distributed ; and while there is evidence that the variance is heterogeneous, no systematic relationship has been discovered between the mean and the standard deviation of the determinations on individual samples. Thus, since it would be impracticable for investigators to do replicate determinations as a routine, no improvement over simple unweighted least squares estimation on untransformed data suggests itself.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document