scholarly journals Complications after Totally Implantable Venous Port Catheter Intervention in Cancer Patients

Author(s):  
Reyhanoglu Hasan ◽  
Ozcan Kaan
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatice Odabas ◽  
Nuriye Yıldırım Ozdemir ◽  
Ipek Ziraman ◽  
Sercan Aksoy ◽  
Huseyin Abali ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Po-Chin Wang ◽  
Huei-Lung Liang ◽  
Tuno-Ho Wu ◽  
Jer-Shyung Huang ◽  
Yih-Huie Lin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 827-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Aziret ◽  
Oktay İrkörücü ◽  
Cihan Gökler ◽  
Enver Reyhan ◽  
Süleyman Çetinkünar ◽  
...  

As part of the vascular access procedures, venous ports, commonly referred to as catheters, are placed under the skin to enable safe and easy vascular access for administration of repeated drug treatments. 122 patients who had received a venous port catheter insertion procedure in the general surgery department between January 1012 and January 2014 were involved in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: those who had undergone a fluoroscopy (group 1) and those who had not undergone a fluoroscopy (group 2). Complications that emerged during and after the port catheter insertion procedure and successful insertion rates were recorded in the database. Data of these patients were presented in a prospective manner. There were 92 to 30 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. In group 1, the mean age was approximately 56.8, total catheter stay time was 20,631 days, and mean time of port use was 224.2 days. In group 2, the mean age was approximately 61.2, total catheter stay time was 13,575 days, and mean time of port use was 452.5 days. Successful insertion rate was 100% and 90% in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). The proper insertion of the port catheter accompanied by monitoring methods can decrease procedure-related complications. Statistical comparisons between the two groups in terms of malposition and successful insertion rates also support this view (P < 0.05). The findings support the view that in cancer patients, a venous port catheter insertion accompanied by a fluoroscopy can be safely performed by general surgeons.


2010 ◽  
Vol 83 (994) ◽  
pp. 850-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Yukisawa ◽  
Y Fujiwara ◽  
Y Yamamoto ◽  
T Ueno ◽  
K Matsueda ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 463-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.C. Chen ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
Y.C. Chen ◽  
S.F. Chien ◽  
H.F. Kao ◽  
...  

Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-406
Author(s):  
Yen-Hsiang Wang ◽  
Chieh-Shou Su ◽  
Keng-Hao Chang ◽  
Chi-Jen Went ◽  
Wen-Lieng Lee ◽  
...  

The use of central venous port access is increasing due to the requirements of multimodal intravenous therapy.1 However, catheter malposition in smaller veins can lead to vein thrombosis, phlebitis and pain. Herein, we report our experience with the use of percutaneous interventions to correct migrated port catheter malposition. Minimally invasive percutaneous interventional correction of malposition could be an alternative to extraction and re-implantation of malpositioned port catheters.


2016 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 1315-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Kokuryo ◽  
Shigeru Hibino ◽  
Kazushi Suzuki ◽  
Katsutaka Watanabe ◽  
Yukihiro Yokoyama ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document